The main problem is that it doesn't work through NAT routers or firewalls, since it relies on the remote end opening a connection back to the client. There's no big advantage unless you're talking to an old FTP server that doesn't support passive FTP.
--Amanda On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Paweł Hajdan Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > This is http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3073 . I think > it's not so hard to implement it (and probably not so high priority either), > but are there any potential security (or other) problems? > > > -- "Portability is generally the result of advance planning rather than trench warfare involving #ifdef" -- Henry Spencer (1992) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
