FYI: Mac does have this dialog, and it's actually 1 click away, as the there is a menu item in the menu bar to directly invoke it (since Safari and Firefox have menubar entries for this). TVL
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Adam Barth <[email protected]> wrote: > > There's a slight race condition in making various things public. > Basically, this is a mechanism a high-security site can use to signal > to the browser that it would like strict handling of HTTPS errors. > For example, when the site opts into this features, HTTPS certificate > errors will be treated as fatal to the connection. > > More details will be surfacing soon in the form of an standards-track > specification. > > Adam > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Erik Kay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > For those of us who are curious, could someone explain what this does? > > > > Erik > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Finnur Thorarinsson > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 to what Peter is saying. > >> Like Brett, I have no clue what this checkbox means and think it > shouldn't > >> have been added. > >> However, the question I have... is it appropriate to tuck this in with > >> something like deleting the history (like we do with last session, > recently > >> closed tabs, autogenerated keywords, etc)? > >> It is hard for me to evaluate that, not knowing what this does... :) > >> -F > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 16:09, Evan Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Brett Wilson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Evan Martin <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Adam Langley <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> >>> > >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) > >>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >>>> Whoever added this UI, please remove it before I have to when I > get > >>> >>>> back next week. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Very well, reverting. > >>> >> > >>> >> Why not #ifdef around it? I fear if you revert you'll never check > it > >>> >> in again. > >>> > > >>> > If that happens, it's the best possible argument that this is a silly > >>> > thing to add. > >>> > >>> No, it's just the argument that it's not the sort of thing people are > >>> willing to expend the energy to argue about. With this sort of > >>> response I'd be tempted to just give up on the patch. > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
