There are issues with the sandbox because it is creating the renderer and plugin processes in a job object.
I recall runas has issues too because of the CREATE_BREAKAWAY_FROM_JOB flag is not working. You may want to try to disable the job object functionality of the sandbox but I'm not sure this is what you want either. M-A On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Daniel Cowx <[email protected]> wrote: > > To be clear, I don't want to run within a job **only** so I can be > notified of exit (obviously I could do this with a handle), so please > don't suggest that I do that instead <wink>. What I am looking for is > a solution to how I can run not only the sandboxed target processes, > but also the main broker process within a job. > > Thanks, > Daniel > > On Sep 17, 5:58 pm, Daniel Cowx <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'd like to run chromium (the broker) within a Windows job so that I >> can be notified when it exits. Does anyone know if this is possible? >> My preliminary testing (with a job that imposes no limits whatsoever) >> is causing problems unless I use the "no-sandbox" or "single-process" >> flags; which is not what I want to do. Thoughts? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
