> BTW, do you typically have useful history on these branches? > Typically the reason to preserve history is for commit logs (which we > drop when we commit the branch as a squash) or for merges (which we're > breaking because we're rebasing). > It would be a lot faster if it could forward-port a branch as a single > commit instead of multiple.
No, I usually don't have useful history in my local branches (most of the time I upload to codereview after every commit anyway). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
