+Dimitri, who is doing that and didn't put Jeremy in the loop. On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Jeremy Orlow <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Jeremy Orlow <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Eric Seidel <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Yaar Schnitman <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > 1. An internal webkit chromium port try bot: Will help test webkit-only >>> > patches. At first stage, it will test build failures (saving many of us >>> > the >>> > need to manually test on 3 platforms), but later will also conduct >>> > chromium >>> > port layout tests and api unit tests. >>> >>> By "internal" do you mean that only Googlers can access it? >>> >>> Is there a command I could wire into bugzilla-toll post-diff which >>> would post to this try-bot as well? Could you detail such a command? >> >> I believe that only people with @chromium.org accounts can currently use >> try bots. I'm not aware of any discussion about whether or how we should >> give access to @webkit.org people. > > Btw, I think it's fairly clear we should give access to WebKit developers; I > just haven't seen/heard any discussions about it. And there might be > security concerns that make it impossible to simply allow every WebKit > contributor to use them without some additional sign up process. > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
