I just had crashbot add a totally unrelated stack trace to a bug. I emailed anthony about it, we'll see.
Something is clearly wrong. On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Scott Hess <[email protected]> wrote: > > Does this relate to receiving crashbot emails adding "Crash" labels on > closed-out bugs where the backtrace doesn't apparently have any > relevance to the original backtraces involved with the bug? I've > gotten a couple of these in the past week. > > -scott > > [Unfortunately, I don't remember the earlier one, the latter is > http://crbug.com/13113 ] > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:58 PM, John Abd-El-Malek <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Anthony LaForge <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> The short of it: >>> >>> People manually associated bugs in http:crash >>> My tool creates its own map of signatures and for whatever reason that bug >>> is on all of them >>> It goes through each aggregate signature and updates the status of the bug >>> (which is a flash crasher) >>> It's made much worse because we are dealing w/ crashes that don't have >>> symbols and cannot be aggregated... >>> >>> What went wrong: >>> >>> The limiting function (seeing if crash-VERSION) was applied does not >>> happen for priority updates. This was actually intentional since we start >>> looking at crash data early on. However this should no longer be needed >>> since we wait for enough data that priority should no longer be shifting. >>> >>> What can be done about it? >>> >>> I will put a limiter on setting the priority >> >> Thanks. >> >>> >>> Kind Regards, >>> >>> Anthony Laforge >>> Technical Program Manager >>> Mountain View, CA >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Patrick Johnson <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> John's question is about why it's generating so many issue updates. >>>> >>>> Patrick >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Anthony LaForge <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > It's the role account that manages crashes and crash related bugs. >>>> > Kind Regards, >>>> > >>>> > Anthony Laforge >>>> > Technical Program Manager >>>> > Mountain View, CA >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Patrick Johnson <[email protected]> >>>> > wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> [+laforge] >>>> >> >>>> >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:51 PM, John Abd-El-Malek <[email protected]> >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >> > I got 21 emails in the last day >>>> >> > for http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=20915 >>>> >> > >> > >>>> >> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > > > -- Mike Pinkerton Mac Weenie [email protected] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
