That will help too. I've been missing On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Julie Parent <[email protected]> wrote:
> Would another solution be to have canary bots for both release and debug? > That will certainly help. I've rolled in test failures into our tree because the canaries didn't detect the debug ones. Still, it would be great if a gardener (or anybody) who's just changing some layout tests or expectations could test them against a specified build that already exists on one of the bots (e.g. the canaries), rather than wait 30-60 minutes for that build to complete. > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Yaar Schnitman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The layout try bots are just too slow for the purposes of webkit >> gardening, which needs to keep up with the fast stream of layout test >> breakage coming from webkit.org. Gclient and compilation consume most of >> the time, but the gardener is usually only interested in the layout tests >> themselves. >> >> How hard would it be to ask the bots to use chrome built by the canaries >> rather than waste time rebuilding it from scratch? >> >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
