On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 00:44, Ian Fette <[email protected]> wrote: > In an effort to provide more transparency into what the team is working on, > I'm sending out the meeting notes from the green tree task force to > chromium-dev, below. I will try to send further notes to chromium-dev from > our meetings. >
Sounds great! > > - Flakiness > - Brought down to acceptable levels for unit tests. Need help to > keep it that way and not regress. > > I think that unit_tests are well and happy, but ui_tests are another story. We have UI tests which have more than 100 flaky flips in just two weeks. And we have UI tests which fail on almost every try run. IMHO such "outstanding" (is that the right word?) cases of flakiness should be fixed with a high enough priority. And we still have lots of problems with resource-related flakiness, like this: [FATAL:resource_bundle.cc(133)] Check failed: false. [FATAL:tab_renderer.cc(132)] Check failed: waiting_animation_frames->width() % waiting_animation_frames->height() == 0. This is making all ui tests super-flaky. It's windows-specific, and I was asking about the issue several times on chromium-dev. Unfortunately, I don't know how to fix or even analyse it (but I can help). Please note that fixing this should visibly decrease flakiness of all ui tests, not only the Top25 flaky ones. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
