mmoss has been working on the make gyp generator, maybe he has a better feel for what's keeping us from switching.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Albert J. Wong (王重傑) <ajw...@chromium.org> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel <mar...@chromium.org> > wrote: >> >> Not that it is effective :) > > Starred. :) > Now what? > >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel <mar...@chromium.org> >> wrote: >> > Have you tried starring http://crbug.com/22044 ? >> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Albert J. Wong (王重傑) >> > <ajw...@chromium.org> wrote: >> >> If I'm not mistaken, I think like most everyone running on linux is >> >> using >> >> the make build nowadays, and the make build seems to work well enough >> >> for >> >> most people. The only time I hear someone mention the scons build, >> >> it's in >> >> reference to "you broke the scons build," or "so you developed on make. >> >> Did >> >> you check it worked on scons?" >> >> Given that, what's keeping us from killing the scons build completely? >> >> My current motivation for asking is that I've been spending the last >> >> hour >> >> trying to figure out why scons is deciding to insert an -fPIC into my >> >> build, >> >> whereas make is not. This is on top of my previous motivation (from >> >> about 3 >> >> days ago) where I spent another few hours making something that worked >> >> fine >> >> on the make build, scons compatible. I'd rather spend that time >> >> killing >> >> scons if there was a clear list of what was needed to make that happen. >> >> -Albert >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
