Same here...

W7+VS2008 is a lot better combination than Vista+VS2005 was for me.

As for Intellisense, I have not had any problems with it on my new box, but
I rely on Visual Assist anyway so maybe I'm not seeing the problems you are
running into. Or, maybe I just have more hotfixes and service packs
installed.

(shrug).


On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 14:42, Dimitri Glazkov <dglaz...@chromium.org>wrote:

>
> Sounds pretty rough -- no wonder you don't like it :). For what it's
> worth, I use VS2008 as my primary and don't see any of these issues.
>
> :DG<
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Mike Belshe <mbel...@google.com> wrote:
> > I've been using VS2008 on Win7 for the last month or so.
> > I hate it.
> > Problems:
> > 1) Stepping in the debugger is SOOOOOOO slow.  I am thinking about going
> > back to VS2005.
> > 2) If you turn on Intellisense, it crashes like crazy very regularly.
>  I've
> > turned off intellisense, but it is a big loss in productivity to do so
> > I strongly recommend against VS2008; do others have these problems?
> > Mike
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) <b...@chromium.org>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> FYI.
> >> VS2008 builds with /MP by default, and it's well supported, so when
> >> present there's no reason for us to not use it by default. Note that you
> can
> >> still force VS2005 by setting GYP_MSVS_VERSION=2005 in your environment.
> >> Thanks Brad!
> >> -Ben
> >>
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: <b...@chromium.org>
> >> Date: Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:26 PM
> >> Subject: Re: Switching vs2008 to be preferred when present.
> >> To: bradnel...@google.com
> >> Cc: gyp-develo...@googlegroups.com
> >>
> >>
> >> LGTM
> >>
> >> http://codereview.chromium.org/341041
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > >
> >
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to