+1

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Avi Drissman <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm OK with that.
>
> Just make it clear that the sheriff does have authority. One time when I
> was sheriff I wanted to revert a broken patch. The author insisted on
> patching it over and over. He finally got it working about about seven
> patches and nearly three hours or so, when I was insisting on backing it out
> after the first 30m.
>
Yes, this is exactly what we want to avoid.

The 2-minute rule usually includes:
"Oops, I forgot to commit a file"
"Let me disable the test I just added, it clearly does not work"
"Oops, before committing I renamed a variable and forgot to change it at one
place"

It also use to mean:
"Oops, I forgot an include". But this one has been biting us to much in the
past, so I leave it at the discretion of the sheriff.

I think people need to use their good judgement too. The length of a minute
should be inversely proportional to the number of people trying to commit
during this time of the day.

Nicolas


> Avi
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Peter Kasting <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Ojan Vafai <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> To be clear, here's the proposed policy: Any change that would close the
>>> tree can be reverted if it can't be fixed in <2 minutes.
>>>
>>
>> How about:
>>
>> If a change closes the tree, the change author has 1 or 2 minutes to
>> respond to a ping.  The change should be reverted if the author doesn't
>> respond, if he says to revert, or if he does not say he has a fix within the
>> next 5 minutes.
>>
>> I can't fix _any_ problem in 2 minutes.  But I can fix most of them in 5.
>>  The goal is to allow the author a reasonable chance to fix trivial problems
>> before we revert.  And I think the tree should go ahead and close during
>> that interval.
>>
>> PK
>>
>> >>
>>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to