On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Peter Kasting <pkast...@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Ian Fette <i...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Putting on my individual contributor hat here, I have to say that Ben's
>> solution would seem very non-intuitive to me. I'm not aware of any app that
>> works that way, and I would probably think that the dialog was just cut off
>> (as is currently the case on my netbook), and would not expect to be able to
>> somehow auto-scroll it by touching the edge. It seems to me that you would
>> want to somehow visually indicate that there is more of this dialog to be
>> seen, preferably show how much dialog is left to be seen and allow someone
>> to move through that, at which point we're talking scroll bars...
>
>
> Also throwing my hat into the ring to say that I don't think Ben's proposal
> is great.
>
> I think Ben's goal is to fight against options sprawl. Being hardnosed
> about not adding scrollbars or tabs is a way to put pressure on to decrease
> options menu size, rather than increase. I applaud this principle.
>
> The thing is, if we're already offscreen, and we add a magic solution like
> "autoscroll at screen edge" or any other similar solution, we effectively
> have a scrollbar -- just a hard to use one. It's the worst of both worlds.
>
> I would love to see us continually rip out more and more options. If we
> are unable to do that, I think having a scrollbar is better than having a
> magic scroll function.
>
>
proposals on which of these options (again, see original attachment) to "rip
out" are welcome and within the scope of this thread.
> PK
>
--
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
