You all are right! IMHO, perceiving the real content in an ad-filled web page takes more time than waiting a web page which is rendered with an old-type javascript engine or opened in the same process. Google Chrome without any ad-blocking mechanism is just a trial for me. On the other hand, I don't think Google takes this into account because of the Google Ads :)
Ismet On 3 Eylül, 22:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Good luck on getting google to block ads. Won't happen until they > introduce some plugin system. > > On Sep 3, 9:28 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Signed ! > > > On Sep 3, 4:25 pm, ratsouffle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Signed also! We need a petition :) > > > > On Sep 3, 9:14 pm, Aztek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > signed ! > > > > > get adblock :) > > > > > love it in firefox > > > > > On Sep 3, 6:58 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > I will not fully switch over from FireFox 3 until I am able to have > > > > > some sort of automaticadblocking and manualadblocking (right click > > > > > the image - block). Also, I would love to be able to switch from > > > > > Chrome's rendering engine to IE's, since some of microsoft's website > > > > > requires their rendering web engine. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
