There has been a lot of grief and complaints by Windows 2000 users to the fact that Chrome runs on XP SP2 and Vista only.
I wonder if there's any architectural reasons (ie depends on some Microsoft libs only present in XP SP2) or only that someone used the default switches on Microsoft's compilers thus generating an XP-only executable. Believe it or not Win2k is still used a lot, and even in some embedded applications where kernel size does matter. In short: anyone tried compiling this under win2k? Could Google reconsider and eventually offer Chrome for Win2k as well? Coupled with Chrome's fast Javascript engine, it would bring back to life lots of old systems that are simply unable to cope with Ajax apps in IE or Mozilla Gecko, but which given the enhanced Chrome performance might become useable on Win2k+Chrome... Thanks, FC PS: The complaining I mentioned is here: http://downloadgooglechrome.gosublogger.com/2008/09/google-chrome-browser-download.html --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
