Yes, but still I have the same issues when browsing web pages with flash on it. And as a proper user .... I can't see is 3.1 faster or not in terms of browsing experience. When I'm testing Firefox (3.0,3.1 ....) vs Opera 9.61(5252) on a same web page I have 12% CPU for Opera and 68% CPU for Firefox. With Safari 3.1.2 (5525.20.1) I have 53% CPU - just the same with Stainless 0.3.
Still I'm using FF because of all the goodies and the correct rendering, but this flash issue is very annoying. I. Nikolov On Oct 20, 9:09 pm, "Youssef Mohammed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have you tried firefox 3.1 beta ? It is supposedly faster. > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:04 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Dear All, > > I'm really (as many other users) excited about Chromium. But when > > approximately Mac OS version will be available for us? There is no > > good browser for Mac OS. Firefox is full with features, considering > > all these add-ons, but it's very slow. If you have flash on the web > > you are just browsing ..... you are already one core less. Opera in > > terms of performance is maybe the best choice for Mac OS, but ...... > > there are no such goodies as Firebug ... etc. So, the question is > > when. > > > I. Nikolov > > -- > Regards, Youssef --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
