You can use the command line --safe-plugins . It will put all the plugins in
the sandbox. Some of them will break.
You can also add some exceptions for the plugins you want to run outside the
sandbox (because they don't work in the sandbox and you "trust" them).

For example, my command line looks like :

--safe-plugins
--trusted-plugins=nppdf32.dll,npdsplay.dll,activex-shim,gears.dll

If you find bugs with plugins, feel free to file bugs (and cc me if you
can), but since this is not supported yet, we might not get to them really
fast.

Nicolas


On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Cameron King <[email protected]>wrote:

> So does anyone know of a way to disable plugins that aren't completely
> safe?
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 18:46, Cameron King <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> This past week, a co-worker and I both got bitten by a PDF that loaded
>> in the browser using Adobe's plugin and carried a payload of two
>> executables files.  Both Firefox and Chrome (with the help of Adobe's
>> plugin) let the malicious files execute.  (It's a blood-chilling,
>> power-strip-kicking sort of feeling to see two malicious exe's running
>> as children under your browser in Task Manager...)
>>
>> In the past, I've always used Firefox+NoScript (among other plugins)
>> as a first line of defense against this sort of thing, but I switched
>> to Chrome when it first came out.  Really, if I wanted to play with
>> Chrome I should have been running it in a VM... but what can I say?  I
>> got excited... and lazy.
>>
>> I know that plugins can be sandboxed if they are "Chromified," but
>> it's my understanding that sandboxable plugins are few and far between
>> right now and that most plugins run outside the sandbox just like they
>> would in IE or Firefox.  Is there any way to completely disable
>> support for non-sandboxed plugins until something like NoScript comes
>> along for Chrome?
>>
>> (Also, I'm having a hard time finding detailed information on how
>> Chrome manages security, so I apologize in advance if I've used the
>> wrong terminology.  Is jail the right term instead?)
>>
>> --
>> Cameron
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Chromium-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to