Even the latest version (build 9136) still has a problem with http://blogs.msdn.com where the content is blank...
On Feb 4, 10:16 pm, PJC <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Erek, > > I think it'd be good if that URL was publicised better - I wasn't > aware of it at all. > > I'm now running build 9029, which not only resolves the 2.0.159 > problems, it also seems to work correctly with Live Mail (!) > > -PJC > > On Feb 1, 6:13 pm, Erek Speed <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > It's a good point that more people testing is probably better. > > > On the other hand, there's probably some annoying overhead in pushing > > a release to the auto updater. Given that there's been at least 30 > > updates to trunk since the build 8857 that Mohamed mentioned, it makes > > sense for them to make them available to dev channel at a specific > > interval. > > > For those don't know the public has access to the latest builds here: > > >http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-xp/ > > > It's not as convenient as the auto updating when a new build is > > released on dev channel but it allows you faster access at least. > > > On Feb 1, 5:57 am, PJC <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Erek, > > > > in the very first reply to this topic, Mohamed stated: > > > > "Hi Evan, This has been fixed in the latest build. Chromium > > > 2.0.160.0 > > > (Developer Build 8857)" > > > > My comments are in light of that statement. Yes, I understand the Dev > > > build(s) are there for bug-finding, etc, but when bugs in that build > > > *have been found and fixed*, wouldn't it make sense to release that > > > later build, or at least allow those of us who are running the Dev > > > build a mechanism to easily obtain such a later build so that rather > > > than using a different browser (my solution), we are continuing to > > > test Chrome and therefore finding any NEW bugs that may be present. > > > > As it is, I (for one) am not finding any new issues, nor testing > > > Chrome *at all* at the moment simply because the only released Dev > > > build is unusable on a large number of sites. > > > > Surely, if a large number of testers is what is wanted in order to > > > find bugs, then it makes sense to provide an accelerated build to > > > those very testers when a major bug is discovered ***and fixed***. > > > That's my point. > > > > -PJC --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
