On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Lex1 <[email protected]> wrote: >> Gears isn't any slower than local storage will be, but it has some >> issues in that it requires UI to enable it, so it's not practical for >> content scripts. > Hmm... I did tests with html Speed Dial (20 cells). And localStorage > in Safari faster than Gears in Chrome at least 10 times. Latency for > Gears about 0.2 sec.
Can you post the code? There are some things it is important to do for performance. For example, you should use a transaction around your writes. Also, I'm not sure if Safari local storage immediately flushes to disk. If it doesn't that would explain why it is faster. - a --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
