The next closest thing to the content window splitter is the Chrome
Dual View bookmarklet:
http://www.chromeplugins.org/plugins/google-chrome-dual-view/

If you want to view 2 parts of the same webpage, you can just enter
the same URL twice.

Also, if you want an up/down split, you will need to modify the
bookmarklet to use frameset rows, instead of cols.

On Jun 26, 6:57 am, Itai <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jun 25, 6:55 pm, bibach <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > As of the version of Chrome I'm currently running, 2.0.172.33, I have
> > found only three features (and one tweak) that I really desire.  I did
> > a quick search of the known issues list and either could not find any
> > reference to these or was unsure of how they might be described.
> > The first two features are ones I have seen in other browsers.  Since
> > I do a certain amount of development work, I frequently need to browse
> > HTML or XML on my local file system.  My preferred method, in most
> > cases, is to just type the path in the address bar.  Other browsers
> > will recognize that I'm typing a path and offer to auto-complete each
> > component of the path.  I think this would be a very handy addition to
> > Chrome.
>
> You can enter requests like this at crbug.com, they get triaged and if
> sound, get prioritized this way.
>
>
>
>
>
> > On this note, the "tweak" is that it would be nice if I could scroll
> > "around the end" of the drop-down list of suggestions, as I find,
> > often enough, that the item I'm after is nearer the end than the
> > beginning, such that one or two up-arrow presses, rather than a bunch
> > of down-arrow presses, would be a little faster.  (Yes, I'm a little
> > obsessive about how quickly I can get little things done, but it *is*
> > often about the little things, isn't it?)
>
> > The second feature, also seen in other browsers, is some sort of
> > default rendering of XML files, such as a simple indented hierarchy,
> > possibly with the option to collapse branches of the hierarchy to ease
> > navigation of large files.  Ideally, this could be done with the
> > option to configure a default XSLT transform (or possibly CSS
> > stylesheet) to be used, allowing for some customization of the default
> > display.  I'm not familiar enough with the current makeup of Chrome's
> > architecture to say what the feasibility of these various options
> > might be.
>
> Its on our todo list ;) See issue 434. You are welcome to help.
>
>
>
>
>
> > So far as I'm aware, the last feature is not available in any major
> > browser (I stick to Chrome as much as possible, so I don't keep tabs
> > on some of the other options), but it is familiar from other major
> > applications.  This is the ability to split the content window in two,
> > top and bottom, to allow two different vertical sections of the same
> > page to be viewed at once.  This has significant utility on a variety
> > of pages that may have information near the top or bottom, such as
> > headers or footers of some kind, that can help to understand
> > information in the middle of the page.  Obviously, numerous similar
> > scenarios exist.  I did find some references to similar-sounding ideas
> > in this forum, but nothing quite the same.
>
> > None of these features seem, to me, to be all that radical, so I
> > suspect some discussion may have already taken place on one or more of
> > them.  Pointers to such discussions would be most welcome. :)  Ditto
> > for current development efforts of which I may not be aware.
> > Otherwise, if these ideas sound good to others, I'll be happy to write
> > them up for the issue list and possibly even contribute some work
> > toward refining them into some solid requirements or even design, if
> > that help would be welcome.
>
> > -Brandon :)
>
> Thanks for your feedback!
>
> - Itai
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to