Thanks for the response. Ok, that makes sense as to why things aren't working.
Yes, that link you sent is how I even found this message list, but to be honest... that link really doesn't have anything useful (as far as a list of functions, and their current status). It really would be good to create a project, and list all the functions, so that people can see the status, and possibly even other developers can jump in and help. But it's hard to do much of anything, if no one really knows much of anything about the project. I've searched everywhere, checked "greasespot", checked Google, checked thousands of different forums, and posts, and even Mashable. No on seems to know anything about it, and no one seems to even have any clue about the project, it's status, or what commands/functions are even implemented yet. I (and millions of others) would really love to see Greasemonkey support added to Chromium. There are about 2+ Million users that are using Greasemonkey scrips (for Firefox) that hate Firefox, and have been blowing up the message boards complaining and asking if there was a way to run their greasemonkey scripts in Chrome (or Chromium). I've spent the past 2-3 weeks searching, and everywhere I look, it seems to be the same question. Nobody seems to know much about it, and that same ONE link shows up in all the posts. It doesn't seem to answer any questions, and all it does is direct people to this Dev list. Could we maybe get a Greasemonkey WIKI page? With some detailed instructions, and also a status update on all the functions. This would at least help others (that want to get involved), and help move this project forward. It seems to be stuck in "park" for the past 9+ months, and doesn't seem like anyone is doing much of anything and I've seen a lot of posts of people offering to help with the project, but there doesn't seem to be any information available, as to where/who/how, or what is even going on. Could we at least post a status page, to show a list of ALL the Greasemonkey functions, and see which functions are "not yet implemented" and "partially implemented" and "ready for testing". Also can we see a name of the contact person for each function. This way people can step forward and at least help with the project. I think it might move much quicker, if this would have a bit of organization to it, and others could get involved and help. >From all the posts that I've been reading, it seems that nothing has been done for 9+ months now, and other than the flurry of posts in December, all the recents posts are just complaining that "it doesn't work" and nobody seems to have any answers, any explanation, or even any clue as to what the status of this is, or how others can even get involved to help. Could we at least get a WIKI page setup, with some contact info, and a status page, just so users and developers can get an idea of what is going on with the Greasemonkey project, and how they can get involved to help? It doesn't seem to be going anywhere (as far as I can tell), and from all the posts, everyone has the same complaints, that the whole project is "dead in the water" and nothing is getting done or moving forward. I would love to try and get a few developers to help, if we could at least get an idea as to what is going on, and maybe organize this project a little bit better so that others can get involved (and help this move forward). On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:17 AM, PhistucK <[email protected]> wrote: > Greasemonkey support is offered in Chrome as User Scripts.None or almost > all of the native Greasemonkey functions are not implemented, though. > This is the design document and the reference. When more support is added, > this document will probably be updated. > http://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/user-scripts > > ☆PhistucK > > > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 18:14, Mark Malewski <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I've read thousands of posts, all over... but all of them seem to say the >> same thing, that Greasemonkey doesn't work, or that some/most people can't >> get it to work: >> http://mashable.com/2008/12/15/google-chrome-greasemonkey-scripts/ >> >> <http://mashable.com/2008/12/15/google-chrome-greasemonkey-scripts/>Could >> we get some clear, and concise instructions on using Greasemonkey with >> Chromium, and could we see a status page, of all the functions (and what >> their current status is) so we can get an idea of how far along Greasemonkey >> development is on Chromium? >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Mark Malewski <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >>> I've tried installing the latest Google Chrome (2.0.172.33) and I've >>> also installed the latest Chromium 3.0.193.0 (20244) build as of July >>> 8, 2009, hoping to use Greasemonkey in Chrome or Chromium. >>> >>> I've been reading thousands of posts on various websites, about >>> Greasemonkey support in Google Chrome/Chromium, but none of the >>> scripts we've tried using function properly. >>> >>> What is the status of Greasemonkey support in Chrome/Chromium, what >>> functions have already been implemented, and what is the status of >>> support for the following Greasemonkey functions: >>> >>> Add support for: >>> >>> GM_registerMenuCommand >>> GM_getValue >>> GM_listValues >>> GM_deleteValue >>> GM_setValue >>> GM_xmlhttpRequest >>> >>> These six GM_ functions are the only functions that we really need at >>> the moment that don't seem to be currently supported, is there any way >>> that these functions could possibly be added to Chromium, so that we >>> can begin using Greasemonkey in Chromium? >>> >>> Thank-you for all that you do, >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
