On Nov 15, 3:56 am, wayne <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > I'm having a discussion about spdy - the way i see it is: > > it sits atop the existing infrastructure - clients capable of working > with speedy send a request with headers signifying this, the response > is a spdy response - otherwise it's standard. > > the url's don't need to change - the browser notifies the server with > appropriate headers that it can deal with spdy. > > is this right?
Right > > the argument i'm getting is that - potentially we're going to need to > have sites like: spdy://google.com yes, we don't want to introduce any visibility to end users, so we're not planning on a visible protocol scheme. It would still be http and https. Mike > > is that correct? > > w:// -- Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss
