Well yeah, I can imagine, it was just a suggestion.
On Aug 28, 9:49 pm, PhistucK <[email protected]> wrote:
> Actual and working LocalStorage support was added only in the past week or
> two.Before that, you had to turn it on manually and separately, along with
> turning on extensions.
>
> I guess he wanted to make it work, in general, first, with the new version
> and then manipulate it to use the right approach of using LocalStorage.
>
> ☆PhistucK
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 19:50, arienh4 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > IMO it's a better idea to use LocalStorage instead of cookies
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Chromium-extensions" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-extensions?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
