There is a fairly complex system that integrates into mail clients and browsers. All the logic of its work is realized in binary modules and it is impossible to put it in the JavaScript-code of extension. Do you suggest that NPAPI-plugin exchange messages with scripts that will perform DOM modification?
On Sep 25, 1:44 pm, Daniel Wagner-Hall <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Alexander Martinyuk > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello. I have a question to the browser developers. > > I write an extension, which requires access to the document with a > > binary module (DLL). > > I am using for this NPAPI-plugin and technology NPRuntime. But every > > call of elementary function through an API takes too much time. In > > Firefox I used the XPCOM-components. Working with the DOM in Firefox > > through XPCOM is HUNDRED times faster than in Chrome through > > NPRuntime. I understand that this is due to multi-process > > architecture, but with such limitations integration of my extension > > into Chrome is impossible. Do you plan to add binary components that > > are available to the content scripts and have access to the DOM? If > > not, do you plan to optimize the speed of DOM from the middle of the > > NPAPI-plugin? > > You're certainly right that NPAPI is orders of magnitude slower than > other means of manipulating the DOM... Is it possible for you to do > more processing in Javascript, perhaps in an extension background > page/content script? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-extensions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-extensions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
