On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Andrew Richards <[email protected]> wrote: > > Furigana Injector looks cool :) > > For jdic-chrome, rather than fiddle much further with JavaScript > optimizations, I think the next step to reduce memory would be simply > to do all language-related tasks in an NPAPI plugin hosted in the > background page, interfaced with JavaScript. Binary compatibility for > each platform would be the only major drawback I can think of. This > would be a larger undertaking, but if there's enough interest > expressed, I could eventually take some time to do it. There are also > obviously missing interface and preferences options, etc.
Worth throwing in that from my experience of NPAPI, you're talking about about a 1 second lag for the marshalling to happen between the Javascript call to the C embed and the C code actually responding doing anything... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-extensions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-extensions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
