Good question, this is an very important information.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Billiam" <[email protected]> To: "Chromium-extensions" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 7:31 AM Subject: [chromium-extensions] Extension performance: Caching and many files vs. one big file. > For a complex page, should I: > Separate out css, javascript and javascript libraries into individual > files, and including them via <script src="js/myfile.js"> and <link> > in the page's head? > > Or: > > Add the contents straight into the head of the document (assuming > there's no css/js reuse across multiple documents)? > > For a non-local webpage, there's a performance advantage to the first > one, since those assets will be cached by the browser. > > For a page running from a local directory, though, am I just > introducing an unnecessary delay while the individual assets are > fetched from disk? > > Similarly, am I better off fetching images from individual jpg files, > or base64 encoding them and embedding them in the HTML document, aside > from the inconvenience during development. > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Chromium-extensions" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-extensions?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-extensions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-extensions?hl=en.
