I don't explicitly ask for view-source pages, and in fact it used to not work on view-source pages.
Dylan On Dec 6, 6:42 pm, Adam Barth <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, that's pretty cool. Do you have to explicitly ask for view-source > pages, or does every content script for http pages run on view-source > pages too? > > Adam > > > > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Dylan Greene <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think it's a feature that it works on the view-source pages - it > > lets extensions improve that page as well. Example: the extension I'm > > working on adds html validation and js lint to the view-source page. > > > On Dec 6, 5:17 pm, Adam Barth <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Dylan Greene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > But it does work on view-source of the same file: > >> > view-source:http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.3/ > >> > jquery.min.js > > >> We're injecting content scripts into view-source pages? That sounds like > >> a bug. > > >> Adam > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Chromium-extensions" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/chromium-extensions?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-extensions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-extensions?hl=en.
