> On 29/08/2015, at 12:28 am, Miroslav Lichvar <mlich...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:21:01PM +1200, Bryan Christianson wrote:
>> When a large spike occurs in offset_sd the drift removal interval can be
>> set to an excessively long time, although what ever event caused the
>> perturbation has passed. At the next set_sync_status() we now compare
>> the expected drift removal interval with that currently in effect.
>> If they are significantly different, the current timer is cancelled
>> and new cycle started using the new drift removal interval.
> 
> Looks good. Just one comment.
> 
>> +/* if current_drift_removal_interval / drift_removal_interval exceeds this 
>> */
>> +/* ratio, then restart the drift removal timer */
>> +
>> +#define DRIFT_REMOVAL_RESTART_RATIO (DRIFT_REMOVAL_INTERVAL / 
>> DRIFT_REMOVAL_INTERVAL_MIN)
> 
> I meant to set the ratio directly to 8, so it doesn't change when
> someone adjusts the minimum interval for instance.
> 
> I can amend it if that's ok with you.

Please do.

B
--
To unsubscribe email chrony-dev-requ...@chrony.tuxfamily.org with "unsubscribe" 
in the subject.
For help email chrony-dev-requ...@chrony.tuxfamily.org with "help" in the 
subject.
Trouble?  Email listmas...@chrony.tuxfamily.org.

Reply via email to