On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 01:38:25PM -0700, Denny Page wrote:
> I’m a little late to the party, but I thought it would be worth visually 
> noting the positive impact that the nanosecond timestamp changes have had. 
> The first graph is from a dedicated chrony monitoring system. The transition 
> from 2.4 to the current version occurs midway though the graph. Nothing too 
> dramatic, but still a noticeable improvement. The second graph is from a more 
> active general server. The improvement here is much more significant.

Which offset do the graphs show? The one from statistics.log? The
improvement might be related also to the correction for asymmetric
jitter that was included recently.

> Thank you for all the hard work. I’m really looking forward to hardware 
> timestamps. :)

I'm busy with other things right now, but I hope I'll have something
ready for testing soon. It's a lot of new code and I need to put it in
a better shape before I can push it to git. Anyway, here is how my
chronyc sources and sourcestats look right now :).

210 Number of sources = 1
MS Name/IP address         Stratum Poll Reach LastRx Last sample               
^*                 1   1   377     1   +259ns[ +267ns] +/-   23us
210 Number of sources = 1
Name/IP Address            NP  NR  Span  Frequency  Freq Skew  Offset  Std Dev
==============================================================================              24  11    46     +0.000      0.009     +0ns   151ns

Miroslav Lichvar

To unsubscribe email chrony-dev-requ...@chrony.tuxfamily.org with "unsubscribe" 
in the subject.
For help email chrony-dev-requ...@chrony.tuxfamily.org with "help" in the 
Trouble?  Email listmas...@chrony.tuxfamily.org.

Reply via email to