I tested with a usleep(100) following the sendmsg() call. This didn’t appear to 
have any impact. Was the usleep() intended to influence the order of timestamp 
vs. server response messages?


> On Nov 14, 2016, at 11:04, Miroslav Lichvar <mlich...@redhat.com> wrote:
> usleep() should be called after sendmsg(), e.g. in
> NIO_SendPacket().

Reply via email to