I tested with a usleep(100) following the sendmsg() call. This didn’t appear to have any impact. Was the usleep() intended to influence the order of timestamp vs. server response messages?
Denny > On Nov 14, 2016, at 11:04, Miroslav Lichvar <mlich...@redhat.com> wrote: > > usleep() should be called after sendmsg(), e.g. in > NIO_SendPacket().