On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 08:59:17PM -0800, Denny Page wrote:
> I tested with a usleep(100) following the sendmsg() call. This didn’t appear
> to have any impact. Was the usleep() intended to influence the order of
> timestamp vs. server response messages?
Yes, that was the idea. Could you try increasing the sleep interval to
1000 or maybe 10000? Anyway, I asked about this on the Intel
To unsubscribe email chrony-dev-requ...@chrony.tuxfamily.org with "unsubscribe"
in the subject.
For help email chrony-dev-requ...@chrony.tuxfamily.org with "help" in the
Trouble? Email listmas...@chrony.tuxfamily.org.