On Dec 2, 2016, at 7:57 AM, Miroslav Lichvar <mlich...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:07:53AM -0600, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
>>> How about returning 0 if the clock was in a synchronised state (the
>>> reference was updated at least once) and 1 if not? With -q that would
>>> be 0 only if the clock was stepped.
>> 
>> Yes, that would work for our situation.
>> 
>> For example using "chronyd -q -u ntp -t 10", if after 5 seconds the clock 
>> was in a synchronized state, it steps the clock and exits 0.  Alternatively 
>> if after 10 seconds the clock was not yet in a synchronized state, it would 
>> exit with a non-zero (timeout) return.
> 
> The -t option is now in git. If you test it, please let me know if it
> works for you as expected.

Thanks Miroslav !  I will test it shortly.

It is truly a testament to well written code that this feature adds in so 
cleanly.

Lonnie


--
To unsubscribe email chrony-users-requ...@chrony.tuxfamily.org
with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
For help email chrony-users-requ...@chrony.tuxfamily.org
with "help" in the subject.
Trouble?  Email listmas...@chrony.tuxfamily.org.

Reply via email to