Hi Miroslav.

The requirement that we are trying to meet is " Time accuracy must be within 1 
ms of true time.", as described in Section 5.18 of 
https://www.nena.org/resource/resmgr/standards/NENA-STA-010.2_i3_Architectu.pdf.

I am currently connected to the NRC Internet-accessible time servers from our 
lab environment.  I am so close to meeting the spec (~1.3ms reported root 
dispersion) that I thought I would reach out to the experts to see if there was 
some adjustment that I might try.  :-)

I am running chrony within a virtual environment (VM) so have disabled rtcsync 
and enabled rtcfile within the .conf file.  I will look at reducing the 
maxclockerror and increasing the minsamples setting.  Any additional items to 
consider would be appreciated!

Thanks.

Daniel J. LeBlanc, P.Eng., MBA, DTME | Senior Network Architect | Bell Canada


-----Original Message-----
From: Miroslav Lichvar [mailto:mlich...@redhat.com] 
Sent: January-07-19 10:47 AM
To: chrony-users@chrony.tuxfamily.org
Subject: Re: [chrony-users] Chrony offset and stability adjustments?

On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:32:00PM +0000, LeBlanc, Daniel James wrote:
> Thanks for your quick reply.  I have done a bit of searching and have not 
> been able to find anything regarding how we can improve the root dispersion 
> (as you have described).  Based on the description of how root dispersion is 
> calculated 
> (https://serverfault.com/questions/768280/what-is-ntp-dispersion-and-how-do-i-control-it
>  - see ladder diagrams and associated description half way down the page), 
> even reducing the polling interval on the local server will not improve the 
> calculated root dispersion amount.  Is there anything that can be done short 
> of using a closer and lower stratum NTP server as a source to further reduce 
> the root dispersion?

If the computer had a very stable clock, you could set the
maxclockerror option to a smaller value and possibly also increase the
minsamples option to force chronyd to keep more samples and reduce the
uncertainty in the estimated frequency.

But that is unlikely to be the case in a VM.

What problem are you trying to solve? A root dispersion of a few
milliseconds is usually fine.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar

-- 
To unsubscribe email chrony-users-requ...@chrony.tuxfamily.org 
with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
For help email chrony-users-requ...@chrony.tuxfamily.org 
with "help" in the subject.
Trouble?  Email listmas...@chrony.tuxfamily.org.


--
To unsubscribe email chrony-users-requ...@chrony.tuxfamily.org
with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
For help email chrony-users-requ...@chrony.tuxfamily.org
with "help" in the subject.
Trouble?  Email listmas...@chrony.tuxfamily.org.

Reply via email to