Thanks Julius and Spencer for your suggestions. I think I have a better handle now, but still reading and reading and reading (and taking rather too long to reply).
Stuart On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:16 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > I like to think of phasing as an approximation to and generalization of > flanging, which is easier to understand. In both cases you are basically > mixing two copies of the input signal where one copy is delayed relative to > the other. This relative delay causes cancellation ("notches") at > frequencies where the two signals are out of phase. > > - Julius > --------------------------------- > > Honestly it can take a few readthroughs (of different books even) for it all > to sink in. > > Julius also some discussion on implementing a phaser: > https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/pasp/Virtual_Analog_Example_Phasing.html > and (related, simpler) flanging: > https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/pasp/Flanging.html > > spencer _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
