hey Casper thanks! I think the issue may also be in the statement if (i%iMax > jCount ) 0.0 =>s.gain;
which is not the same as if (now%iMax > jCount ) 0.0 =>s.gain; because I don't think "now" increments at the same rate as i (I wonder if now increments one sample at a time, rather than .1 ms at a time, then they become equivalent, thus your fix.). Anyway, not sure--haveto try this at home. Cheers, Charlie On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:00 PM <chuck-users-requ...@lists.cs.princeton.edu> wrote: > Send chuck-users mailing list submissions to > chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > chuck-users-requ...@lists.cs.princeton.edu > > You can reach the person managing the list at > chuck-users-ow...@lists.cs.princeton.edu > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of chuck-users digest..." > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: two similar shreds with different results (Casper Schipper) > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Casper Schipper <casper.schip...@gmail.com> > To: ChucK Users Mailing List <chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu> > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 09:31:01 +0100 > Subject: Re: [chuck-users] two similar shreds with different results > Hi Charlie, > > I think I found it: .1::ms is not the same as 1::samp > You do in both scripts .1 ::ms => now, but in the second variant, this > means now will have increased by 4.1 samples, instead of 1 unit (depending > on your samplerate). > I could get the same sound from both scripts by changing .1::ms => now to > samp => now; > > Best, > Casper > > On 27 Jan 2019, at 14:58, Charlie <taos.poi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hey folks, I'm puzzled why these two shreds don't make the same sound. I > created a simple bit crusher using an integer as an index and then using > time as an index; I thought these were equivalent but they aren't. I wonder > if this is because the integer increments at a different rate than the > sampling rate? Any guidance on this gratefully received! Thanks, > > Charlie > > First shred: > //--------------------------------------------- > > SinOsc s => dac; > > 110 => s.freq; > > 0 => int i; > 250 => int iMax; > 0 => int jCount; > > while (true) { > i++; > > // if (i%130 == 0 || i%201 ==0 || i% 737 == 0) 0 =>s.gain; > if (i%iMax > jCount ) 0.0 =>s.gain; > jCount++; > if (jCount > iMax) 0 => jCount; > // 1::samp => now; > .1::ms => now; > 1 => s.gain; > > } > > //--------------------------------------------- > > second shred: > > //--------------------------------------------- > > SinOsc s => dac; > > 110 => s.freq; > > 0::samp => dur jMin; > 250::samp => dur iMax; > 0::samp => dur jCount; > 1::samp => dur jDelta; > > while (true) { > > if (now%iMax > jCount ) 0.0 =>s.gain; > jCount+jDelta => jCount; > if (jCount > iMax) jMin => jCount; > .1::ms => now; > 1 => s.gain; > > } > > > //--------------------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ > chuck-users mailing list > chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu > https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users > > > _______________________________________________ > chuck-users mailing list > chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu > https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users >
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
