Eric, do you know which update/patch broke HICC? /Jerome. On 10/1/09 12:27 AM, "Jiaqi Tan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is there any way we can mark out only the log collection changes for > 0.3 release, and "freeze" HICC at the last point where it was working? > > Jiaqi > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Ariel Rabkin <[email protected]> wrote: >> I dissent. I think robust log collection, is an important application >> in its own right, particularly log collection that makes the data >> MapReduceable. A release with log collection but not HICC would be >> much better than no release. >> >> Is there harm in doing a release without HICC, or without a working HICC? >> >> --Ari >> >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Jiaqi Tan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I second Eric on that, without HICC there's only the back-end data >>> collection which I believe would not be as useful. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jiaqi >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Eric Yang <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hicc is currently broken. The "create dashboard" feature is broken due to >>>> incompatible Jasper.runtime.ELContextImpl bundled in Apache taglib and >>>> jetty-jsp api. I have a working solution to remove apache taglib from Hicc >>>> code, and going with pure REST & serve HICC views from HDFS. I need at >>>> least 3 more weekends to complete this. I think it's better that we put >>>> off >>>> the 0.3 release and go with 0.4. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Eric >>>> >>>> On 9/29/09 10:39 PM, "Ariel Rabkin" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hrm. Are there other features on the horizon that are worth waiting >>>>> for? Even without SALSA, Chukwa supplies useful functionality and I >>>>> think it's worth getting something out there. >>>>> >>>>> I'm sort of inclined to do a 0.3 release without SALSA, and then a 0.4 >>>>> whenever SALSA is ready to go. A 0.4 release could also include a >>>>> number of other improvements -- there are things I want to do over the >>>>> coming months, and I suspect Jerome is also implementing things. >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts? >>>>> >>>>> --Ari >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Jiaqi Tan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> We're still missing a subclass of the AbstractDataProcessor for fully >>>>>> automating the end-to-end process of converting post-Demux output to >>>>>> state-machine entries for SALSA processing, but I don't see myself >>>>>> finishing that for at least a month. I would commit some of the >>>>>> command-line tools with documentation on how to get the end-to-end >>>>>> process done manually as a stop-gap, I can change those JIRAs to >>>>>> blockers for 0.3 and I can get those done in a week or two. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jiaqi >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Ariel Rabkin <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Howdy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How does everybody feel about making a formal release of 0.3 ? I can't >>>>>>> get to it until next week, but I think we could do it then. The >>>>>>> current SVN trunk is stable, reasonably well documented and fairly >>>>>>> well tested. Are there blockers for release that aren't listed on >>>>>>> JIRA? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --Ari >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Ari Rabkin [email protected] >>>>>>> UC Berkeley Computer Science Department >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ari Rabkin [email protected] >> UC Berkeley Computer Science Department >>
