Hi everyone, I will not be able to release my stuff since I had to switch to something else for the last month.
Could we have a sync on who/how chukwa is used today? /Jerome. On 1/19/10 12:41 PM, "Ariel Rabkin" <[email protected]> wrote: > So let's see. We have a patch for 440, that looks ready to go. > How are 444 and 442 going? > > I can document the SocketTeeWriter. > > I'd like to do something about CHUKWA-447 -- metrics being too > expensive to collect -- but I don't quite know what the fix is. > > Also, we should address CHUKWA-446 -- the scripts -- and update > documentation accordingly. > > --Ari > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Eric Yang <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Ari, >> >> I vote to fix CHUKWA-440 for 0.4. CHUKWA-444 and CHUKWA-422 are nice to >> have, but they might not be feature complete by February. >> >> HICC REST API, SocketTeeWriter and Socket Data Loader framework should be >> added in 0.4 documentation. >> >> Regards, >> Eric >> >> On 12/30/09 2:44 PM, "Ariel Rabkin" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi all. >>> >>> I think it's time to start thinking about releasing 0.4. We have a >>> fair number of accumulated new features and bug fixes. Version 0.3 >>> came out in November, so I think we might reasonably target a branch >>> date of Feb 1 for 0.4. How's that sound? I think there have been >>> enough improvements since 0.3 to justify the release. >>> >>> --Ari >> >> > >
