Those features should continue to work as they are. I think you are fine. Regards, Eric
On 2/1/11 10:55 PM, "Bill Graham" <[email protected]> wrote: No, we're not using MetricsDataLoader or any of the HICC/MySQL functionality so we should be all good. We use Demux for 5 minute aggregation and the hourly/daily roll-up processes with our own summary jobs. On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Eric Yang <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Bill, > > Chukwa 0.5 still supports demux by mapreduce. However, the database > code has been removed. Does your deployment depends on > MetricsDataLoader? > > regards, > Eric > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Bill Graham <[email protected]> wrote: >> We're not ready to migrate to HBase for our Chukwa processing at this >> point. This is mainly because the current Demux approach is working >> well for us and we aren't running HBase in production yet. We'd want >> to run 0.5.0 using the current Demuxer and data processors. >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Eric Yang <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> How are we doing in adopting HBase as part of required Chukwa >>> component? I wonder if anyone has comment or feedback? >>> >>> For releasing Chukwa 0.5, we need 2 more features implemented. >>> CHUKWA-567, and CHUKWA-576. One is dealing with down sampling, and >>> another one is creating UDF to improve counter and gauge metrics >>> calculation. Is anyone interested in taking on those tasks? >>> >>> I am working on creating rpm target for hadoop and pig for ASF. This >>> should improve deployment experience for the end user. >>> >>> regards, >>> Eric >>> >> >
