Renamed subject. I think you bring up a valid concern. To be sure, the infrastructure and administrative costs are negligible. So, we don't need to worry on that account. However, the ASF Incubator is not a place where you can hang your shingle up and hope that someday someone will wander by and be interested.
The Incubator is merely a vetting mechanism to make sure that a community has a minimal set of ducks in a row as well as proven that it is a vibrant community. Here at Chukwa we've had not many commits beyond patches, no dev talk, and no releases. That's the problem. A +1 is not a judgement on the technology or its developers. It is a simple recognition that Chukwa, for what ever reason, has been unable to generate an active community. Regards, Alan On Nov 20, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Ariel Rabkin wrote: > My vote is 0 -- abstain. I would be happy to leave the project in > incubation longer in case something turns up, but I'm not paying the > administrative costs, so I don't feel able to vote -1. > > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Alan Cabrera <[email protected]> wrote: >> All, >> >> The current thinking among the PPMC is that it's time to retire the Chukwa >> podling. Eric is working on getting the Subversion history ported to a new >> home on GitHub. >> >> Please cast your vote: >> >> [ ] +1 to retire the Chukwa project >> [ ] 0 for Don't care >> [ ] -1 for No, please keep it alive (please provide arguments why) >> >> >> Regards, >> Alan >> > > > > -- > Ari Rabkin [email protected] > Princeton Computer Science Department
