On Apr 5, 2013, at 7:21 AM, Jukka Zitting <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Alan Cabrera <[email protected]> wrote: >> With that said, we do need to be transparent in our reporting with respect to >> the inactivity of the project and the community's decision to graduate in >> spite >> of it. > > Looking at the decline of dev@ activity over the past few months I'm > starting to agree with Alan on the issue of graduation/retirement. > Quoting my message from general@ in November [1]: > > The question here isn't about exact metrics or some predefined level > of activity that the project should be able to reach, but rather the > trajectory you're on. Is there a reasonable expectation that Chukwa > can reverse the downward trend in activity? What are you going to do > to make that happen? > > Unfortunately the downward trend has continued, and we don't have a > good idea on how to turn it around or at least keep it stable at the > levels from say last year. > > With over three months since the last non-trivial code change > (CHUKWA-565) and nearly two months since last bits of development > discussion (CHUKWA-679), the situation looks much worse than it did at > the end of last year. I would note this drop in activity in the > report. > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/q75bqeyxg3i5idqo > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting Jukka, I've updated the mentor list at the bottom of Chukwa's report. Would you care to mark the report as reviewed? Regards, Alan
