This seems possible, but one thing that would need to be changed is the directories that demux uses. For example: demuxProcessing/mrInput demuxProcessing/mrOutput
These would need to dynamic directories with the timestamp or something else in them to keep two jobs from interfering with each other. On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Corbin Hoenes <[email protected]> wrote: > Finding demux to be a bit too slow for our needs. It seems like only 1 > runs at a time; is there some technical reason why we couldn't run a couple > in parallel? If so any hints on how difficult it would be to run multiple > demuxers at a time? > > >
