The British historian Michael Burleigh has reviewed it in the British Literary Review's new issue, at http://www.literaryreview.co.uk/burleigh_04_09.html, and he gives some useful attention to places where he feels d'Este's account of Churchill as military man and commander-in-chief suffers in comparison or is superior to other accounts. I have not been reading this book, but have read d'Este's comparable study of Eisenhower, and found it pretty good.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ChurchillChat" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ChurchillChat?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
