Excellent point, Anthony!
CES

----- Original Message -----
From: Anthony Calabrese <[email protected]>
To: List Churchill <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:56:57 -0000 (UTC)
Subject: RE: [ChurchillChat] Pearl Harbor. Recently reported: is it correct?


One other thing to keep in mind.  Had Churchill known, he would have warned the 
US.  Why do I so strongly believe this?  Because when Churchill did have 
warning of an impending attack (the USSR), Churchill warned the country in 
question (whose leader promptly ignored it as he believed Churchill's message 
was a capitalist plot to start a war).  
 
 




 
 



 



From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ChurchillChat] Pearl Harbor. Recently reported: is it correct?
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 05:55:22 -0400



NO...not a snip.  This is more of the conspiracy folks running amok. Bletchley 
Park had made little progress against the Japanese codes--and their 
understandable focus was on Germany in any case.  While we had broken many 
Japanese codes, we surely didn't have all of them. There are many books on this 
topic--and some are wholly misleading. Roberta Wholstetter's PEARL HARBOR: 
WARNING AND DECISION, though an old book (early 1960s) remains one of the best 
available studies. The key problem was that none of the decoded Japanese 
messages--even after the war--represented a clear "smoking gun" that the attack 
was coming. For much of the raw material--the messages themselves, plus good 
analysis--see THE "MAGIC" BACKGROUND OF PEARL HARBOR issued by DOD in seven 
cloth-bound volumes in 1977.
 
Chris Sterling
(Washington Society for Churchill)
 




From: John Mather 
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 12:42 AM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: [ChurchillChat] Pearl Harbor. Recently reported: is it correct?

Recently reported:

"President Roosevelt did not know beforehand about Pearl Harbor because Winston 
Churchill, who did know because the British broke the code, did not tell 
President Roosevelt because Mr. Churchill wanted us in the war."

Is there a shred of evidence for this assertion?????



John H. Mather MD


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ChurchillChat" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/churchillchat?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ChurchillChat" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/churchillchat?hl=en.
                                          

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ChurchillChat" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/churchillchat?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ChurchillChat" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/churchillchat?hl=en.

Reply via email to