The Bottom Line is very simple,  Law vs Liberty, The dictates of the Elected vs the Freedoms of the MINORITY.  I can only think of the Colonial Patriots that loaded powder and shot in to their crude muskets, I wonder "did they think what they were doing was ILLEGAL  ? ". Sorry my friend But I say SCREW THE BLACK ROBED TYRANTS just one more time.  I am firmly convinced the 2nd American Revolution is already underway.

John Polifronio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This ought to teach any of us the lesson that no insitution is so exalted that it can be trusted to rise above the narrow interests of a band of political fanatics.  These 5 "Injustices" have debased the highest Court in the land.  They're no better than the raedical right wingers they serve.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 8:29 AM
Subject: [demso] IGNORE these Black Robed BASTARDS - US S.Ct. Curtail free-speech rights

This ruling is ABSURD.  The 4 to 5 Opinion MUST be absolutely IGNORED.  The idea that the FREEDOM of Speech can be so limited as to CURTAIL and CHILL the INALIENABLE RIGHT to Expose The Conduct of Government To The Light of FULL Public Scrutiny is UNVARNISHED TYRANNY.  This is one of those cases where I fully advocate IGNORING these Black Robed BASTARDS.  GOD BLESS WHISTLE BLOWERS
The Freedom of speech and of the press are fundamental personal rights and liberties,  the exercise of which lies at the foundation of free government of free people...(it)... is a cardinal principle of Americanism,   Marsh v Alabama, 326 US 501, 90 L Ed 265, 66 S Ct. 276;  Jones v Opelika, 316 US 584, 86 L Ed 1691, 62 S Ct 1231, 141 ALR 514; Scheider v State, 308 US 147, 84 L Ed 155, 60 S Ct. 146; Tampa Times Co. v Tampa 158 Fla 589, 29 So 2d 368, app dismissed 332 US 749, 92 L Ed 336, 68 S Ct 69
The American colonists fought the Revolutionary War because an oppressive government was infringing on their rights; had the Founding Fathers been censored or stifled, we would not have the nation that we have today. The First Amendment is the first for this very reason;  the most important rights,  those governing the freedoms of  _expression_ and opinion,  came first in the Constitution.  Throughout America's history, one can see that dissent and protest have been the fuel for the many reforms that have changed the country. Indeed, freedom of  _expression_ is what makes the United States a beacon of hope to many impoverished inhabitants of the world. To escape a world of repression and come to America, the land of the free, was and still is one of the great dreams of persons around the globe.   The First Amendment allows us to say what we feel, but it will only remain strong if people are not afraid to exercise their rights.
The primary meaning of the phrase "liberty of the press" as understood at the time our early constitutions were framed, was freedom from ANY censorship of the press and from all such restraints upon publications as had been practiced by monarchial or despotic governments in order to stifle (CHILL) the efforts of the Patriots toward enlightening the fellow subjects upon the rights and as to the duties of their rulers  Schenck v United States, 249 US 47, 63 L Ed 470, 39 S Ct. 247;  Patterson v Colorado 205 US 454,  51 L Ed 879; 27 S. Ct. 556;  Respublica v Oswald 1 US 319, 1 L Ed. 155; State vs. McKee, 73 Conn 18, 46 A 409;  State ex rel. Crow v Shephard 177 MO 205, 76 SW 79
Judson Witham Gives The 5 Republican VAMPIRES two thumbs DOWN and a hearty :

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A closely divided so much for the first amendment.....U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that government whistle-blowers are not protected by free-speech rights when they face employer discipline for trying to expose possible misconduct at work.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

"NOTICE:  Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse nor protection save to call for the impeachment of the current President and his Cabinet."

Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.

New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
Call regular phones from your PC and save big.

Complete archives at

Please let us stay on topic and be civil.


United state bankruptcy court western district of texas United state life insurance United state patent
United state patent search United states patent office United state flag


Reply via email to