If anyone can reach Professor Jones, tell him that I published the first 
article on the fact that there were bombs in the WTC in my December 2001 
edition. He should, however, keep reading because there is more on the bombs in 
subsequent editions. I had him in my Address Book, but removed him and several 
other professors because they don't listen to me anyway.

As for that idiot who said how could it have been bombs in the buildings, he 
needs to read that the planes were used as a decoy on both the WTC and the 
Pentagon so they could blame Arabs so they would be able to go to war against 
them and Afghanis.

I have articles or information in the Did You Know? feature of every edition 
since that #4 December 2001 edition.


Arlene Johnson
Click on the icon that says Magazine to access my editions.
Password for the 2006 editions: message

-----Original Message-----
>From: Vigilius Haufniensis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sep 10, 2006 8:23 AM
>To: cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [cia-drugs] Experts Say Professor Wrong on World Trade Center Theory
>Experts Say Professor Wrong on World Trade Center Theory
>September 9th, 2006 @ 9:10pm
>SALT LAKE CITY (AP) -- A Utah professor's theory that the World Trade Center 
>was brought down by explosives is nonsense, experts say. 
>Physicist Steven Jones, co-chairman of a group called Scholars for 9/11 Truth, 
>has been placed on paid leave by Brigham Young University while the Mormon 
>church-owned school investigates the "increasingly speculative and accusatory 
>nature" of his claims. 
>Jones questions official findings that explosive jet fuel from hijacked 
>airplanes turned steel floor supports rubbery and brought down the World Trade 
>Center, suggesting hidden explosives imploded the skyscrapers. 
>"Number one, why would you bother with the planes if you could bring down the 
>buildings with bombs?" said William Connolly, director of New Jersey's 
>Division of Codes and Standards and an advocate for strengthening buildings 
>against terrorist attacks. 
>"Second, that whole theory is just utterly inconsistent with the evidence," 
>Connolly told the Deseret Morning News of Salt Lake City. 
>"This happened in plain view. The National Institute of Standards and 
>Technology had very detailed pictures analyzing it in a very detailed way. We 
>know exactly what happened and exactly why they fell, and it has nothing to do 
>with bombs," he said. 
>Leslie Robertson, chief architectural engineer of the World Trade Center, said 
>Jones' theory was "utterly ridiculous." 
>Connolly and Robertson were featured on the recent PBS program "Nova: Building 
>at Ground Zero," which examined why the buildings failed in a minute-by-minute 
>Jones, a physicist at BYU since 1985, remained in seclusion on Saturday, 
>refusing interviews. 
>In a CD recording of one of his lectures, obtained by The Associated Press, 
>Jones said a "puff of smoke" that issued from under the impact zone of one of 
>the towers as it gave way was evidence of an explosive charge. He discounted 
>the chance the smoke was blown out by air pressure as the tower started 
>Jones showed side-by-side images of the collapsing World Trade Center towers 
>and other buildings deliberately brought down by implosives, saying there was 
>no difference in they way they fell. He gave the lecture Feb. 1 at Utah Valley 
>State College. 
>For years Jones has been working on cold fusion, claiming he's gotten the 
>elusive energy source to work, though "it's still not enough to power my 
>flashlight yet," he told the Deseret Morning News in interviews before he was 
>suspended on Thursday. 
>The newspaper reprinted some of Jones past comments on Saturday, casting him 
>as isolated from fellow BYU professors who were said to be embarrassed by his 
>association with a 9-11 conspiracy theory. 
>At the University of Utah, Physics Department Chairman Pierre Sokolsky said 
>destruction of the towers was a question best left to engineers, not 
>physicists like Jones. 
>Information from: Deseret Morning News, 

Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/

Please let us stay on topic and be civil. 

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

Reply via email to