http://www.newswithviews.com/Cuddy/dennis70.htm
CAUTION: THE DIALECTIC PROCESS AT WORK
PART 1
By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
July 3, 2006
NewsWithViews.com
Richard Cummings in THE PIED PIPER described the activities of Allard
Lowenstein (who worked with the CIA) in Africa, Spain and Portugal.
One of the important points he made was that while outwardly the U.S.
government was opposing Marxists in Africa, behind the scenes the CIA
actually was befriending (funding) them in order "gradually" to
control them or at least cause them not to be so radical. What this
actually revealed was the dialectic at work, and South Africa has
played an important part in this.
In 1891, gold and diamond magnate Cecil Rhodes in South Africa formed
his secret Society of the Elect "to take the government of the whole
world." Part of Rhodes' plan involved selecting Rhodes scholars
(e.g., Bill Clinton), and among the members of the Rhodes Trust was
the famous author Rudyard Kipling who had swastikas on his early
books. Here is reproduced a 1902 letter (note the suggestive words)
from Kipling in Capetown, South Africa, to noted author H. G. Wells,
who was one of the early Fabian Socialists, with whom Rhodes' people
networked. The Fabians wanted "gradually" to move Britain toward
Socialism.
At the same time Rhodes was developing his plan, William Whitney of
the secret society Skull & Bones developed a plan financially to
contribute to both major political parties, Democrat and Republican,
and then have them alternate power so the public thought it had a
choice when it really didn't. This would be in line with the "hope"
of Bill Clinton's mentor at Georgetown University, Prof. Carroll
Quigley, who authored TRAGEDY AND HOPE (1966) using "secret records"
regarding Rhodes' plan.
Rhodes' people and members of Skull & Bones, all originally well-off
financially, have networked with Marxists/Socialists "gradually"
moving the world toward Socialism dialectically playing political
liberals against political conservatives who alternate power. This is
why there is a 1911 political cartoon by Robert Minor in the ST.
LOUIS POST-DISPATCH showing men of wealth (e.g., John D. Rockefeller,
J. P. Morgan, etc.) welcoming Karl Marx (with a book
titled "Socialism" under his arm) to Wall Street.
Not long after this cartoon appeared, Marxist theoretician Antonio
Gramsci began promoting his plan "gradually" to capture the cultures
of countries rather than taking them over by violent revolutions.
This idea of transforming whole cultures fit with Jan Christiaan
Smuts' concept of holism. Smuts (along with Sir Abe Bailey, Sir
Patrick Duncan, Basil K. Long, Richard Feetham and Sir James Rose-
Innes) belonged to Rhodes' Association of Helpers in South Africa.
Note here the reproduced letter from Smuts to H. G. Wells
stating "The next step is to move the political big wigs forward." In
his book, HOLISM AND EVOLUTION, Smuts described "the foundations of a
new order of the universe." He drafted many clauses of the League of
Nations, and was one of the drafters of the preamble for the United
Nations Charter.
Shortly after Smuts' book was published in 1926, H. G. Wells in 1928
wrote THE OPEN CONSPIRACY: BLUE PRINTS FOR A WORLD REVOLUTION. In
Wells' EXPERIMENT IN AUTOBIOGRAPHY (1934), he described the goal of
the "Open Conspiracy" as "an adequately implemented Liberal
Socialism, which will ultimately supply teaching, coercive and
directive public services to the whole world, is the immediate task
before all rational people....Plans for political synthesis seem to
grow bolder and more extensive....The New Plan in America to the New
Plan in Russia and how are both related to the ultimate World-State?
There must be a common faith and law for mankind....Only after a huge
cultural struggle can we hope to see the world-state coming into
being."
The ultimate goal of the power elite is a synthesis of Western
Capitalism and Eastern Communism into a World Socialist Government.
Powerful financiers had funded the Soviets and in the 1930s funded
Hitler's Germany. In 1936, power elite representative John J. McCloy
(Council on Foreign Relations chairman 1953-1970) would sit in
Hitler's box at the Olympics and in late July 1961 take a friendly
swim with Communist leader Nikita Khrushchev in the Black Sea.
Just as the Soviets had been funded by the power elite, the Communist
Chinese were brought to power by them as well. Actions taken by U.S.
General George Marshall after the Second World War helped the
Communist Chinese defeat the Nationalist Chinese forces of Chiang Kai-
shek, whom the U.S. was supposed to be supporting.
The Communist victories in the Soviet Union and China were important
to the power elite. According to a 1952 map by the World Association
of Parliamentarians for World Government, when the World Government
would come into existence, Mongolian (Chinese) forces would be
patrolling from Southern California (where the Communist Chinese
COSCO has a major presence in the port of Long Beach) into Mexico
(where there is a major Chinese presence as well).
And in 1953, Ford Foundation president H. Rowan Gaither informed
Congressional Reece Committee research director Norman Dodd that they
were under directives from the White House to "make every effort to
so alter life in the United States as to make possible a comfortable
merger with the Soviet Union." This is the synthesis desired by the
power elite.
The Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 was portrayed as a great victory for
President Kennedy against the Soviets, but it was a sham. The plan
was that Soviet missiles in Cuba would be easily detected by the
U.S., and the Soviets would agree to withdraw their missiles from
Cuba in exchange for the U.S. withdrawing its missiles from Turkey
and agreeing not to invade Cuba, which could then be used as a
revolutionary training base for Latin America and Africa (e.g., Cuban
troops went to Angola). In that same year, CFR member Lincoln
Bloomfield prepared Study Memorandum No.7 for Secretary of State Dean
Rusk (Rhodes scholar) in which Bloomfield described how a "world
government" could come about, and then stated: "(But) if the
Communist dynamic was greatly abated, the West might lose whatever
incentive it has for world government." Again, we see how the
dialectical synthesis is designed to work.
Another aspect of this process was revealed in James Simon Kunen's
THE STRAWBERRY STATEMENT (1968) regarding Students for a Democratic
Society (SDS) convention: "...men from Business International
Roundtables...tried to buy up a few radicals. Those men are the
world's industrialists and they convene to decide how our lives are
going to go. They're the left wing of the ruling class. They offered
to finance our demonstrations in Chicago. We were also offered ESSO
(Rockefeller) money. They want us to make a lot of radical commotion
so they can look more in the center as they move more to the left."
This "move more to the left" by the power elite was important to open
the door to trade and other relations with Communist China, as David
Rockefeller praised Chairman Mao's "accomplishments" in an article in
the August 10, 1973, NEW YORK TIMES.
The power elite had to bring Communist China into the "community of
nations" if their strategy of bringing about a World Socialist
Government through linking regional economic arrangements was to
work. The Far Eastern economic region would be linked to the Middle
East, to Europe, to the Americas, and to Africa. Noncompliant people
like Slobodan Milosevic in Yugoslavia and the Taleban in Afghanistan
were stumbling blocks to fulfilling this plan, and therefore had to
be removed.
In H.G. Wells' EXPERIMENT IN AUTOBIOGRAPHY, he revealed that "The
Open Conspiracy has to achieve itself in many ways, but the main
battle before it is an educational battle." In the early 1980s at the
U.S. Department of Education (DOE), I was assigned to brief a
delegation from South Africa about DOE's programs and activities. It
was about this same time (1984) U.S. Secretary of Education Terrel
Bell and Utah State Superintendent Leland Burningham were exchanging
letters about a plan to get Outcome-Based Education (OBE) in all
schools. The "Father of OBE" is William Spady, and his
ultimate "Transformational" OBE is designed to change students'
values. On November 16, 1998, Spady arrived in South Africa to
participate in two major educational conferences in Pretoria and Port
Elizabeth.
The instability in Southern Africa, Israel, Palestine, Iraq and
elsewhere is all part of the dialectical process through which the
power elite plans to bring about a New World Order World Socialist
Government. This New World Order will also have a spiritual component
as represented in the Earth Charter, which I have explained in an
earlier NewsWithViews.com article. Its authors, Mikhail Gorbachev and
Maurice Strong (it was actually written by Steven Rockefeller), have
both indicated the Earth Charter is like a new Ten Commandments, and
it was presented to the U.N. not coincidentally at a conference in
Johannesburg, South Africa. It will be a "common faith" just as H.G.
Wells said in 1934. And this date (1934) is the same year John Dewey
("Father of Progressive Education" who wrote "We are in for some kind
of socialism") authored A COMMON FAITH, in which he proposed "the
surrender of the conception of the basic division to which
supernatural Christianity is committed." For part 2 click below.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Cuddy/dennis71.htm
CAUTION: THE DIALECTIC PROCESS AT WORK
PART 2
By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
July 17, 2006
NewsWithViews.com
In Part 1 of this series on the Dialectic, I referred to Cecil
Rhodes' plan "to take the government of the whole world." In typical
Dialectical fashion, Rhodes' mentor, John Ruskin (who has a swastika
on his grave), said both "I am a Tory (conservative) of the old
school" and "I am myself a Communist of the old school---reddest of
the red." Rhodes' people networked Dialectically with both Skull and
Bones (mostly conservative) members and Fabian Socialists (liberals).
When I was young, I was in touch with a number of world notables, and
during my senior year in high school (1963-64), I was assigned to
portray the famous historian Arnold Toynbee. He was an important
member of Cecil Rhodes' Association of Helpers "to take the
government of the whole world" (see reproduced letter from Toynbee).
>From 1964 to 1968, I attended N.C. State University where Allard
Lowenstein was teaching, and I remember seeing and hearing him on
occasion.
In Part 1 of my series on the Dialectic, I mentioned that Lowenstein
had worked in Africa, Spain and Portugal for the CIA, which had been
involved in university recruitment for some time. Lowenstein had
received his B.A. degree from the University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill in 1949, and when I was attending graduate school there,
one of my professors had been a CIA covert agent who encouraged me to
go to CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia, and another professor
had been a Rhodes scholar in charge of the State Department's Middle
East desk.
The ultimate goal of Cecil Rhodes and the power elite was
Dialectically to synthesize Western Capitalism and Eastern Communism
into a World Socialist Government. When Lowenstein was a student at
UNC in the late 1940s, he was a member of a group called the
Dialectic Senate. At this same time, the CIA was forming the National
Student Association (NSA), of which Lowenstein became president in
1950.
In Part 1 of this series, I mentioned that in 1953, Ford Foundation
president H. Rowan Gaither revealed that they were under directives
from the White House to so alter life in the U.S. as to make possible
a "comfortable merger" with the Soviet Union. Lowenstein would later
work for the Ford Foundation (as well as the CIA). He also was in
contact with quite a few Rhodes scholars, one of whom was Rick
Stearns who was Bill Clinton's traveling companion at Oxford
University as well as international vice-president of the NSA in the
mid-1960s.
In the previous Part of this series, I emphasized the importance of
South Africa in the Dialectic, and in this Part 2, I shall look at
Spain. Lowenstein and the CIA would present themselves as anti-
Communists who also opposed the right wing leadership in countries
like South Africa and Spain (Francisco Franco). Note the Dialectic---
Lowenstein and the CIA would support the Socialists as the
alternative to the far left and far right political extremes. For
years, Lowenstein had supported and networked with U.S. Socialist
Party presidential candidate Norman Thomas. It is worth remembering
here that during his 1948 presidential campaign, Thomas
predicted: "The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism.
But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of
the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist
nation, without knowing how it happened."
Lowenstein began making trips to Spain (for at least 2 decades) in
1958. And Richard Cummings in THE PIED PIPER (1984) indicated that
Lowenstein "knew every Spanish opposition (to Franco) group and its
leadership inside and out." In the early 1960s, he met with the
Spanish Socialist Party (PSOE, Partido Socialista Obrero Espanol).
And in 1964, a young Javier Solana while in college joined the PSOE.
The next year, Solana received a Fulbright scholarship to begin a
doctoral program in the U.S. The Fulbright scholarships were named
for Rhodes scholar Bill Clinton's political mentor, U.S. Senator J.
William Fulbright of Arkansas. In mid-April 1964, Lowenstein was
invited along with President and Mrs. Lyndon Johnson to be dinner
guests at the home of Sen. Fulbright. And that same year, Sen.
Fulbright authored OLD MYTHS AND NEW REALITIES, announcing that "the
concept of national sovereignty has become in our time a principle of
international anarchy....The sovereign nation can no longer serve as
the ultimate unit of personal loyalty and responsibility." As an
example of how the Dialectic works, while Rhodes scholar Sen.
Fulbright was a "dove" on the Vietnam War, Rhodes scholar Secretary
of State Dean Rusk was a "hawk." Cecil Rhodes' plan for world
government was always the goal, though, and in March 1994, a World
Affairs Council chapter awarded Dean Rusk its "World Citizen Award."
After receiving the Ph.D. from the University of Virginia in 1968,
and then teaching there as an assistant professor until 1971, Solana
returned to Madrid to teach and become active again in Spanish
politics in the early 1970s. In a phone interview July 14, 2006,
Richard Cummings told me that Lowenstein and Solana probably did know
each other.
During this time, Rhodes scholar Richard Gardner in the April 1974
edition of the Council on Foreign Relation's (CFR's) FOREIGN AFFAIRS
wrote that "an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece
by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal
assault." Gardner in the article went on to explain how GATT
(including the World Trade Organization) would be part of this
process.
The next year (1975), Spanish ruler Francisco Franco died, and in
1977 Solana was elected to the Spanish parliament and opposed U.S.
military bases in Spain. In 1982, just before the PSOE came to power,
Spain joined NATO with Solana in opposition to that decision.
However, later that same year, after the PSOE came to power, Solana
was appointed Minister for Culture and reversed his position.
According to ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA, "in 1986 he was pivotal in
organizing a referendum to endorse Spain's membership in NATO." At
this point, it is worth remembering that under the Dialectic, the CIA
befriended (funded) Socialists in Spain to control them or at least
make them less radical.
Solana in 1988 was appointed Minister for Education and Science, and
became Minister for Foreign Affairs in 1992. This was the same year
Bill Clinton ran for the presidency, and his adviser on U.N. matters
was fellow Rhodes scholar Richard Gardner.
After Clinton's election, he would appoint his Rhodes scholar
roommate, Strobe Talbott, to the State Department where he eventually
became the number 2 person. During the presidential campaign, Talbott
had written in TIME magazine (July 20, 1992) that "perhaps national
sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all....But it has taken
the events in our own wondrous and terrible century to clinch the
case for world government."
The number 1 man in the State Department, CFR member Warren
Christopher, during his January 13, 1993, Senate confirmation
hearing, discussed with Sen. Joseph Biden the possibility of NATO
becoming a peacekeeping surrogate for the U.N. "to foster the
creation of a new world order." Thus, the people in charge of NATO
politically and militarily would be of critical importance.
It was no surprise, therefore, that President Clinton appointed
fellow Rhodes scholar Gen. Wesley Clark to be military head of NATO.
However, after Javier Solana became political head of NATO on
December 5, 1995, ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA stated, "He was somewhat
unexpectedly chosen." After all, Solana only occupied a ministerial
position in Spain. How was he selected over all other candidates?
The key lies in President Clinton's appointment of Richard Gardner as
U.S. Ambassador to Spain. Gardner and his fellow Rhodes scholars
Clinton and Talbott sealed the "cooperative" Solana's appointment as
political head of NATO. I use the word "cooperative" because while
Solana only approved of Spain's membership in NATO in the 1980s
provided Spain's armed forces didn't participate in military
operations, in the late 1990s as NATO Secretary-General he sent
60,000 troops from 30 countries into Bosnia and Herzegovina (just as
Clinton, Talbott and Gardner desired).
Solana would go on to become on June 29, 2004, the European Union's
first Minister for Foreign Affairs, and he is currently Secretary-
General of the Council of the European Union. He is one of the most
powerful men in the world, and strategically placed by the Dialectic
to facilitate the New World Order, Cecil Rhodes' plan "to take the
government of the whole world."
Not only are people like Solana useful to the power elite in this
regard, but so are U.S. Presidents like Bill Clinton and George W.
Bush (Skull and Bones member, as were his father and grandfather).
The Dialectic uses left and right, liberal and conservative. In this
regard, if you look at the White House website, you will see in the
Oval Office a carpet with the Great Seal of the United States (just
like on the one dollar bill), and the eagle is looking left. However,
if you look at the emblem on the front of the President's desk, the
eagle is looking right ! Is this Dialectical symbolism?
As I have explained before, the power elite's plan is to link
regional economic arrangements to form a World Socialist Government.
Some of the world's people are getting wise to this, and when U.S.
trade negotiators arrived in Seoul, South Korea, on July 9, 2006, to
discuss a "free-trade agreement," they had to have government
bodyguards because of the protesters there.
The power elite wants Korea (South and North) to become part of a
larger Asian-Pacific regional economic arrangement, which can then be
linked to NAFTA, the European Economic Community (European Union),
Africa, etc. The Dialectic uses a certain amount of chaos (e.g.,
uncontrolled borders, violent confrontations, etc.) to cause the
people to accept transnational "agreements" (not treaties, which
would have to be ratified by the U.S. Senate). The South Koreans
probably will be "persuaded" that part of their security against the
current aggressive gestures (missile launches) by North Korea will
depend upon their willingness to accept a "free-trade agreement,"
which might then be offered to North Korea as well.
In the Middle East, there is chaos between Israelis and Palestinians.
The power elite hopes to weary these people, and then offer
the "carrot" of the Middle East FreeTrade Area (MEFTA), which then
can be linked with other regions. President George W. Bush has
already indicated that he wants all nations of the Middle East under
one regional economic authority by 2013. There is already a lobbying
group (including Exxon, Mobil, Bechtel and Halliburton) called the
U.S.-MEFTA Coalition promoting an economic arrangement between the
two regions. Roxane Premont in her NewsWithViews
article, "Sacrificing America for Global Trade" (July 8, 2006), has
concluded that if this arrangement comes about, "it would be entirely
plausible for a company like Dubai Ports to sue the United States
government and win in court," because local businesses cannot be
favored over foreign companies.
How does Solana and Spain fit in all this? Javier Solana arranged a
treaty of association (including security, trade, etc.) between the
European Union and Israel, which was signed November 20, 1995, and
officially ratified June 1, 2000. According to Herb Keinon's June 6,
2006, article in THE JERUSALEM POST, on June 5, 2006, Javier Solana
met in Israel with officials there, telling them he "remained firm on
the need for the Hamas-PA (Palestinian Authority) government to meet
these criteria before gaining international legitimacy: recognizing
Israel, renouncing terrorism and accepting previous agreements."
Relevant to Spain, there is a plan to build a massive TransAmerica
highway splitting the U.S. in half and running from Mexico to Canada,
facilitating a North American region with the "Amero" as a new
currency. The first stage is the TransTexas Corridor, which will be
built by Zachry Construction Company of Texas (George Bush's home
state) and managed by CINTRA, a Madrid, Spain, company which already
manages toll highways around the world, including some in the U.S. Is
it possible that Javier Solana of Madrid, Spain, had a hand in this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Dennis Laurence Cuddy, historian and political analyst, received a
Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (major in
American History, minor in political science). Dr. Cuddy has taught
at the university level, has been a political and economic risk
analyst for an international consulting firm, and has been a Senior
Associate with the U.S. Department of Education.
Cuddy has also testified before members of Congress on behalf of the
U.S. Department of Justice. Dr. Cuddy has authored or edited twenty
books and booklets, and has written hundreds of articles appearing in
newspapers around the nation, including The Washington Post, Los
Angeles Times and USA Today. He has been a guest on numerous radio
talk shows in various parts of the country, such as ABC Radio in New
York City, and he has also been a guest on the national television
programs USA Today and CBS's Nightwatch.
Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/
Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
OM
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
