Comments please. We do know, however, that Hamas was created by Mossad so Israel would never have to sit down and talk peace with the Palestinian people.
Peace, Arlene Johnson Publisher/Author http://www.truedemocracy.net To access my work, click on the icon that says Magazine. >-----Forwarded Message----- >>From: "Michael A. Hoffman II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Sent: Jan 26, 2007 9:56 AM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: 'Blue Game Matrix': US Troops to Kill Iranians in Iraq >> >>The Hoffman Wire >>Dedicated to Freedom of the Press, Investigative Reporting and Revisionist >>History >> >>Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Michael A. Hoffman II: Editor. RevisionistHistory.org >> >>*** >> >>Editor's Note: The "Blue Game Matrix" is US intelligence code for >>instigating war with Iran. The strategy originates with the Israeli >>Mossad and was conveyed to Bush through Vice President Dick Cheney's >>office, in tandem with Deputy National Security Adviser Elliott Abrams. >>Portions of the game plan are being leaked to the public in the >>following news report as part of the Revelation of the Method. --Michael >>Hoffman >> >>*** >> >>TROOPS AUTHORIZED TO KILL IRANIAN OPERATIVES IN IRAQ >> >>The White House has authorized a widening of what is known inside the >>intelligence community as the "Blue Game Matrix" >> >>By Dafna Linzer >>Washington Post >>January 26, 2007; P. A1 >> >>EXCERPT: "In interviews, two senior administration officials separately >>compared the Tehran government to the Nazis and the (Revolutionary) >>Guard to the 'SS.' They also referred to Guard members as 'terrorists.' >>Such a formal designation could turn Iran's military into a target of >>what Bush calls a 'war on terror,' with its members potentially held as >>enemy combatants or in secret CIA detention." >> >>The Bush administration has authorized the U.S. military to kill or >>capture Iranian operatives inside Iraq as part of an aggressive new >>strategy to weaken Tehran's influence across the Middle East and compel >>it to give up its nuclear program, according to government and >>counterterrorism officials with direct knowledge of the effort. >> >>For more than a year, U.S. forces in Iraq have secretly detained dozens >>of suspected Iranian agents, holding them for three to four days at a >>time. The "catch and release" policy was designed to avoid escalating >>tensions with Iran and yet intimidate its emissaries. U.S. forces >>collected DNA samples from some of the Iranians without their knowledge, >>subjected others to retina scans, and fingerprinted and photographed all >>of them before letting them go. >> >>Last summer, however, senior administration officials decided that a >>more confrontational approach was necessary, as Iran's regional >>influence grew and U.S. efforts to isolate Tehran appeared to be >>failing. The country's nuclear work was advancing, U.S. allies were >>resisting robust sanctions against the Tehran government, and Iran was >>aggravating sectarian violence in Iraq. >> >>"There were no costs for the Iranians," said one senior administration >>official. "They are hurting our mission in Iraq, and we were bending >>over backwards not to fight back." >> >>Three officials said that about 150 Iranian intelligence officers, plus >>members of Iran's Revolutionary Guard Command, are believed to be active >>inside Iraq at any given time. There is no evidence the Iranians have >>directly attacked U.S. troops in Iraq, intelligence officials said. >> >>But, for three years, the Iranians have operated an embedding program >>there, offering operational training, intelligence and weaponry to >>several Shiite militias connected to the Iraqi government, to the >>insurgency and to the violence against Sunni factions. Gen. Michael V. >>Hayden, the director of the CIA, told the Senate recently that the >>amount of Iranian-supplied materiel used against U.S. troops in Iraq >>"has been quite striking." >> >>"Iran seems to be conducting a foreign policy with a sense of dangerous >>triumphalism," Hayden said. >> >>The new "kill or capture" program was authorized by President Bush in a >>meeting of his most senior advisers last fall, along with other measures >>meant to curtail Iranian influence from Kabul to Beirut and, ultimately, >>to shake Iran's commitment to its nuclear efforts. Tehran insists that >>its nuclear program is peaceful, but the United States and other nations >>say it is aimed at developing weapons. >> >>The administration's plans contain five "theaters of interest," as one >>senior official put it, with military, intelligence, political and >>diplomatic strategies designed to target Iranian interests across the >>Middle East. >> >>The White House has authorized a widening of what is known inside the >>intelligence community as the "Blue Game Matrix" -- a list of approved >>operations that can be carried out against the Iranian-backed Hezbollah >>in Lebanon. And U.S. officials are preparing international sanctions >>against Tehran for holding several dozen al-Qaeda fighters who fled >>across the Afghan border in late 2001. They plan more aggressive moves >>to disrupt Tehran's funding of the radical Palestinian group Hamas and >>to undermine Iranian interests among Shiites in western Afghanistan. >> >>In Iraq, U.S. troops now have the authority to target any member of >>Iran's Revolutionary Guard, as well as officers of its intelligence >>services believed to be working with Iraqi militias. The policy does not >>extend to Iranian civilians or diplomats. Though U.S. forces are not >>known to have used lethal force against any Iranian to date, Bush >>administration officials have been urging top military commanders to >>exercise the authority. >> >>The wide-ranging plan has several influential skeptics in the >>intelligence community, at the State Department and at the Defense >>Department who said that they worry it could push the growing conflict >>between Tehran and Washington into the center of a chaotic Iraq war. >> >>Senior administration officials said the policy is based on the theory >>that Tehran will back down from its nuclear ambitions if the United >>States hits it hard in Iraq and elsewhere, creating a sense of >>vulnerability among Iranian leaders. But if Iran responds with >>escalation, it has the means to put U.S. citizens and national interests >>at greater risk in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere. >> >>Officials said Hayden counseled the president and his advisers to >>consider a list of potential consequences, including the possibility >>that the Iranians might seek to retaliate by kidnapping or killing U.S. >>personnel in Iraq. >> >>Two officials said that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, though a >>supporter of the strategy, is concerned about the potential for errors, >>as well as the ramifications of a military confrontation between U.S. >>and Iranian troops on the Iraqi battlefield. >> >>In meetings with Bush's other senior advisers, officials said, Rice >>insisted that the defense secretary appoint a senior official to >>personally oversee the program to prevent it from expanding into a >>full-scale conflict. Rice got the oversight guarantees she sought, >>though it remains unclear whether senior Pentagon officials must approve >>targets on a case-by-case basis or whether the oversight is more >>general. >> >>The departments of Defense and State referred all requests for comment >>on the Iran strategy to the National Security Council, which declined to >>address specific elements of the plan and would not comment on some >>intelligence matters. >> >>But in response to questions about the "kill or capture" authorization, >>Gordon Johndroe, spokesman for the NSC, said: "The president has made >>clear for some time that we will take the steps necessary to protect >>Americans on the ground in Iraq and disrupt activity that could lead to >>their harm. Our forces have standing authority, consistent with the >>mandate of the U.N. Security Council." >> >>Officials said U.S. and British special forces in Iraq, which will work >>together in some operations, are developing the program's rules of >>engagement to define the exact circumstances for using force. In his >>last few weeks as the top commander in Iraq, Army Gen. George W. Casey >>Jr. sought to help coordinate the program on the ground. One official >>said Casey had planned to designate Iran's Revolutionary Guard as a >>"hostile entity," a distinction within the military that would permit >>offensive action. >> >>Casey's designated successor, Army Lt. Gen. David H. Petraeus, told >>Congress in writing this week that a top priority will be "countering >>the threats posed by Iranian and Syrian meddling in Iraq, and the >>continued mission of dismantling terrorist networks and killing or >>capturing those who refuse to support a unified, stable Iraq." >> >>Advocates of the new policy -- some of whom are in the NSC, the vice >>president's office, the Pentagon and the State Department -- said that >>only direct and aggressive efforts can shatter Iran's growing influence. >>A less confident Iran, with fewer cards, may be more willing to cut the >>kind of deal the Bush administration is hoping for on its nuclear >>program. "The Iranians respond to the international community only when >>they are under pressure, not when they are feeling strong," one official >>said. >> >>With aspects of the plan also targeting Iran's influence in Lebanon, >>Afghanistan and the Palestinian territories, the policy goes beyond the >>threats Bush issued earlier this month to "interrupt the flow of support >>from Iran and Syria" into Iraq. It also marks a departure from years >>past when diplomacy appeared to be the sole method of pressuring Iran to >>reverse course on its nuclear program. >> >>R. Nicholas Burns, the undersecretary of state for political affairs, >>said in an interview in late October that the United States knows that >>Iran "is providing support to Hezbollah and Hamas and supporting >>insurgent groups in Iraq that have posed a problem for our military >>forces." He added: "In addition to the nuclear issue, Iran's support for >>terrorism is high up on our agenda." >> >>Burns, the top Foreign Service officer in the State Department, has been >>leading diplomatic efforts to increase international pressure on the >>Iranians. Over several months, the administration made available five >>political appointees for interviews, to discuss limited aspects of the >>policy, on the condition that they not be identified. >> >>Officials who spoke in more detail and without permission -- including >>senior officials, career analysts and policymakers -- said their >>standing with the White House would be at risk if they were quoted by >>name. >> >>The decision to use lethal force against Iranians inside Iraq began >>taking shape last summer, when Israel was at war with Hezbollah in >>Lebanon. Officials said a group of senior Bush administration officials >>who regularly attend the highest-level counterterrorism meetings agreed >>that the conflict provided an opening to portray Iran as a >>nuclear-ambitious link between al-Qaeda, Hezbollah and the death squads >>in Iraq. >> >>Among those involved in the discussions, beginning in August, were >>deputy national security adviser Elliott Abrams, NSC counterterrorism >>adviser Juan Zarate, the head of the CIA's counterterrorism center, >>representatives from the Pentagon and the vice president's office, and >>outgoing State Department counterterrorism chief Henry A. Crumpton. >> >>At the time, Bush publicly emphasized diplomacy as his preferred path >>for dealing with Iran. Standing before the U.N. General Assembly in New >>York on Sept. 19, Bush spoke directly to the Iranian people: "We look to >>the day when you can live in freedom, and America and Iran can be good >>friends and close partners in the cause of peace." >> >>Two weeks later, Crumpton flew from Washington to U.S. Central Command >>headquarters in Tampa for a meeting with Gen. John P. Abizaid, the top >>U.S. commander for the Middle East. A principal reason for the visit, >>according to two officials with direct knowledge of the discussion, was >>to press Abizaid to prepare for an aggressive campaign against Iranian >>intelligence and military operatives inside Iraq. >> >>Information gleaned through the "catch and release" policy expanded what >>was once a limited intelligence community database on Iranians in Iraq. >>It also helped to avert a crisis between the United States and the Iraqi >>government over whether U.S. troops should be holding Iranians, several >>officials said, and dampened the possibility of Iranians directly >>targeting U.S. personnel in retaliation. >> >>But senior officials saw it as too timid. >> >>"We were making no traction" with "catch and release," a senior >>counterterrorism official said in a recent interview, explaining that it >>had failed to halt Iranian activities in Iraq or worry the Tehran >>leadership. "Our goal is to change the dynamic with the Iranians, to >>change the way the Iranians perceive us and perceive themselves. They >>need to understand that they cannot be a party to endangering U.S. >>soldiers' lives and American interests, as they have before. That is >>going to end." >> >>A senior intelligence officer was more wary of the ambitions of the >>strategy. >> >>"This has little to do with Iraq. It's all about pushing Iran's buttons. >>It is purely political," the official said. The official expressed >>similar views about other new efforts aimed at Iran, suggesting that the >>United States is escalating toward an unnecessary conflict to shift >>attention away from Iraq and to blame Iran for the United States' >>increasing inability to stanch the violence there. >> >>But some officials within the Bush administration say that targeting >>Iran's Revolutionary Guard Command, and specifically a Guard unit known >>as the Quds Force, should be as much a priority as fighting al-Qaeda in >>Iraq. The Quds Force is considered by Western intelligence to be >>directed by Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, to support >>Iraqi militias, Hamas and Hezbollah. >> >>In interviews, two senior administration officials separately compared >>the Tehran government to the Nazis and the Guard to the "SS." They also >>referred to Guard members as "terrorists." Such a formal designation >>could turn Iran's military into a target of what Bush calls a "war on >>terror," with its members potentially held as enemy combatants or in >>secret CIA detention. >> >>Asked whether such a designation is imminent, Johndroe of the NSC said >>in a written response that the administration has "long been concerned >>about the activities of the IRGC and its components throughout the >>Middle East and beyond." He added: "The Iranian Revolutionary Guards >>Quds Force is a part of the Iranian state apparatus that supports and >>carries out these activities." >> >>Staff writer Barton Gellman and staff researcher Julie Tate contributed >>to this report. >> >>>>> >> >>The HOFFMAN WIRE is a public service of Independent History and Research, Box >>849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA >> >>24 Hour Revisionist News Bureau: >>http://www.revisionisthistory.org/page1/news.html >>Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>Disclaimer: The Hoffman Wire is a controversial and politically incorrect >>e-mail letter intended only for those who have requested it. We have a >>strict anti-spamming policy. The views expressed in the Hoffman Wire are the >>sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not reflect the views of >>advertisers or the transmitter. >> >>Freedom of the Press: A hallowed right. >>Responsible Dissent: A contribution to understanding and dialogue. >>--^---------------------------------------------------------------- >>This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a2iTuc.a70NEf.YWpvaG5z >>Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>For Topica's complete suite of email marketing solutions visit: >>http://www.topica.com/?p=TEXFOOTER >>--^---------------------------------------------------------------- >> >