No, I do not think there was some special charge on plane or otherwise. Peace, K
On Sep 17, 2007, at 9:54 PM, mark urban wrote: > The concept of a shaped charge is what is being proffered. An > inverted cone of metal jacketed high explosive that hits armor > creates a molten stream of metal that burns through the armor plate. > If Loftus wants to say a commercial jet hitting a building behaves > like an RPG7 hitting a humvee, then I would think that we are now > seeing the next phase in the 911 cover up. I lump this right in there > with Mike Ruppert telling us to forget about 911. geez! > > > --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, RoadsEnd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Basically, my understanding of what Loftus is talking about is > what >> happens when a large object moving at a high rate of speed hits an >> immovable object creating high temperatures and thusly >> disintegration. What form this disintegration took and if this >> activity created any special effect I do not know. >> >> Peace, >> K >> >> On Sep 17, 2007, at 2:09 PM, mark urban wrote: >> >>> It is amazing how the laws of physics just went all to hell on > 911. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "Vigilius Haufniensis" >>> <thehatefulnerd@> wrote: >>>> >>>> john loftus is on wtprn right now claiming that "the pentagon >>> plane" turned into plasmic matter. as i understand it, plasmic >>> matter is the fourth phase of matter. solid, liquid, gas, plasma. >>> like in the sun. the sun is "plasmic matter." he's saying that > the >>> plane "vaporized into plasma" and that's why the damage to the >>> pentagon went so deep, because of the "focused energy." >>>> the plane "vaporized into plasma" because that one wall had been >>> armored. >>>> he's saying that this is not inconsistent with finding human >>> remains. >>>> of course, none of this addresses the question as to whether the >>> plane was hijacked, radio controlled, switched out with a drill, >>> etc. could a missile be "vaporized into plasma?" according to >>> loftus, the military HAS weapons that do precisely this. he was >>> stating this as proof that the "plasmic effect" could be possible. >>> heh. >>>> to me, its all just begging the question. for instance, why did >>> the plane fly over the pentagon, do a 180, come all the way back >>> around, and hit THAT side? and what about the alleged explosions >>> before the pentagon strike? >>>> now theyre talking about security cams. >>>> www.wtprn.com >>>> 9:15 pm central time >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ >>> >>> Please let us stay on topic and be civil. >>> >>> OM >>> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links >>> >>> >>> >> > > > > > Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ > > Please let us stay on topic and be civil. > > OM > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
