-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 12 May 2008 11:34 pm
Subject: [IPCUSA] The Oil Nonbubble










Paul Krugman: The Oil Nonbubble

http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2008/05/paul-krugman--1.htm
l

 

Is the high price of oil price due to fundamentals or speculation?: 

The
<http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/12/opinion/12krugman.html?ex=1368244800&en=c
899176fff63fce4&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink>  Oil Nonbubble,
by Paul Krugman, Commentary, NY Times: "The Oil Bubble: Set to Burst?" That
was the headline of an October 2004 article in National Review, which argued
that oil prices, then $50 a barrel, would soon collapse. 

Ten months later, oil was selling for $70 a barrel. "It's a huge bubble,"
declared Steve Forbes... 

All through oil's five-year price surge, which has taken it from $25 a
barrel to last week's close above $125, there have been many voices
declaring that it's all a bubble, unsupported by the fundamentals of supply
and demand. 

So here are two questions: Are speculators mainly, or even largely,
responsible for high oil prices? And if they aren't, why have so many
commentators insisted, year after year, that there's an oil bubble? ...

Imagine what would happen if the oil market were humming along, with supply
and demand balanced at a price of $25 a barrel, and a bunch of speculators
came in and drove the price up to $100. ...

Faced with higher prices, drivers would cut back on their driving;
homeowners would turn down their thermostats; owners of marginal oil wells
would put them back into production. 

As a result, the initial balance between supply and demand would be broken,
replaced with a situation in which supply exceeded demand. This excess
supply would, in turn, drive prices back down again - unless someone were
willing to buy up the excess and take it off the market. 

The only way speculation can have a persistent effect on oil prices, then,
is if it leads to physical hoarding...But ... inventories have remained at
more or less normal levels. This tells us that the rise in oil prices isn't
the result of runaway speculation; it's the result of fundamental factors,
mainly the growing difficulty of finding oil and the rapid growth of
emerging economies like China. The rise in oil prices ... had to happen to
keep demand growth from exceeding supply growth. 

Saying that high-priced oil isn't a bubble doesn't mean that oil prices will
never decline. ... But it does mean that speculators aren't at the heart of
the story. 

Why, then, do we keep hearing assertions that they are? 

Part of the answer may be ... that many people are now investing in oil
futures - which feeds suspicion that speculators are running the show... But
there's also a political component. 

Traditionally, denunciations of speculators come from the left of the
political spectrum. In the case of oil prices, however, the most vociferous
proponents of the view that it's all the speculators' fault have been
conservatives - people who you wouldn't normally expect to see warning about
the nefarious activities of investment banks and hedge funds. 

The explanation of this seeming paradox is that wishful thinking has trumped
pro-market ideology. 

After all, a realistic view of what's happened over the past few years
suggests that we're heading into an era of increasingly scarce, costly oil. 

The ... odds are that we're looking at a future in which energy conservation
becomes increasingly important, in which many people may even - gasp - take
public transit to work. 

I don't find that vision particularly abhorrent, but a lot of people,
especially on the right, do. And so they want to believe that if only
Goldman Sachs would stop having such a negative attitude, we'd quickly
return to the good old days of abundant oil. 

Again, I wouldn't be shocked if oil prices dip in the near future - although
I also take seriously Goldman's recent warning that the price could go to
$200. But let's drop all the talk about an oil bubble.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links






 

Reply via email to