Mind-control and the law, an appropriate juxtaposition. Dr. Ewen Cameron, CIA MKULTRA, McGill U, used drugs and electroshock and isolation. Earl Brian, Phoenix, Hill 451 Gang, visited Cinque in prison, with ref to the Patty Hearst and Symbionese Liberation Army cult. Muhamad & Malvo, cultic mind control. Manson and CIA cult. Jim Jones' building in the US, People's Temple, was owned by KKK and there were CIA aspects to the slaughter in Guyana.
I just wrote here about HBO The Wire's creator David Simon's vid interviews on Youtube. The last link I gave was for his interview at a law school. He talked mostly about journalism, but what he said about non sequitur journalism is what has happened in law. Nobody pursues the truth in fact OR law, mocking both in the Muhamad trial. As a matter of fact, Simon talks about exactly the kind of journalism that covered the Muhamad trial without seeming to notice anything they witnessed. The OJ Dream Team would have gotten Muhamad off, so he represented himself at a critical juncture to assure his conviction, his credit for mission accomplished, like Tim McVeigh acquiescing to his role of lone crazed operative. Reporters almost seem to make themselves co-conspirators by failing to state explicitly if the prosecution was saying the shot came from Pargo's or Bob Evans restaurant. The Muhamad trial reads like a five page transcript, not 10,000 page Warren Commission Report, but the press still can't digest those five pages and tell us anything. If the facts were so bad, and they were, it comes to a matter of law, but there the judge simply stated for the record that the case was the best presented he had ever heard, which was totally wrong but assured child minds that Santa Claus is real and a fragmented bullet could be traced to the Bushmaster and like JFK the bullet made a big hole on entry and never exited, not one particle, and all sorts of folly from there, concerning reversed directions and angles and whether there was a small hole and ultimately whether the shot was fired by Malvo at Pargo's or could have come from Red Roof Inn balcony. The Zapruder film should have been enterred as evidence, and a melon on a fencepost shot and videotaped in slow mo for the benefit of the jury. -Bob --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >From time to time I write a letter. Wrote to the lawyer defending the younger of the two. It was copied with a cover letter to the Virginia Bar. I pointed out that if mind control is not used as a defense he is breaking all ethics. m > I would like to hear your opinion on one idea. > > John Muhamad of Muhamad and Malvo, DC-area snipers during Iraqwar > voting, was only tried for one murder, that of Dean Meyers. > > Muhamad only represented himself for part of that trial. While he was > representing himself, a witness perjured herself to place him at the > scene of the crime. Muhamad did not attack her testimony. > > What do you think of that? > > The witness was a woman who worked at First Virginia Bank. I put the > mapquest map in cia-drugs photos, showing that the bank is a mile from > the crime scene. Why play lawyer yet pass up the opportunity to crush > a softball and send it over the outfield fence as Matlock or Perry Mason? > > By crush a softball, I mean it was this easy. Matlock: "You say your > bank is in the same shopping center as SUNOCO. What is the name of the > shopping center?" > > "The bank is not actually in a shopping center" > > "What is the name of the shopping center SUNOCO is in then?" > > "SUNOCO is not actually in a shopping center either". > > "You said they were in the same shopping center, and then you said > that neither is actually in any shopping center. Are they in the same > parking lot?" > > "No" > > "Do you realize that your bank is exactly one mile from SUNOCO?" > > "If you say so" > > "Your bank and SUNOCO are on opposite sides of six lanes of highway, a > grass median strip, two sidewalks, and two parking lots. Neither is in > a shopping center. Did you tell the prosecution before this trial that > you saw the defendant in the same shopping center where you worked?" > > "No, they told me to say that" > > "The prosecution suborned you to perjure yourself by claiming to have > seen the defendant at the scene of the crime?" > > "Exactly, yes." > > "Were your two co-workers lying here today when they called you a liar > about events the day of the murder?" > > "I guess not" > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/message/44045 <../../../../message/44045> > >
