Begin forwarded message:

> From: Skinny <theskinnyasise...@yahoo.com>
> Date: August 11, 2010 11:19:43 AM PDT
> To: air_america_ra...@yahoogroups.com, fra...@parallel-youniversity.com, 
> illusion_of_free...@yahoogroups.com, the_power_hour...@yahoogroups.com, 
> theneuschwabenlandti...@yahoogroups.com, 
> uncovering_the_tr...@yahoogroups.com, united-stands-amer...@yahoogroups.com, 
> wethepeople_uni...@yahoogroups.com, wheretheblacktope...@yahoogroups.com, 
> catapultthepropaga...@yahoogroups.com, libertarianme...@yahoogroups.com, 
> new_world_order_expo...@yahoogroups.com, openmindfi...@yahoogroups.com, 
> openmindopencoden...@yahoogroups.com, qui...@yahoogroups.com, 
> reality101_re...@yahoogroups.ca, apf...@yahoogroups.com, 
> armageddon-or-new...@yahoogroups.com, 
> catapultthenwopolicestatedepopulat...@yahoogroups.com, 
> coalitionforfreethoughtinme...@googlegroups.com, 
> conspiracy-the...@yahoogroups.com, conspiracybruthascor...@yahoogroups.com, 
> ctrl <c...@yahoogroups.com>, freedomsfo...@yahoogroups.com, 
> hal...@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [ctrl] Hidden Intel.Op.Behind Wiki.Release of 
> ''Secret''Documents?Engdahl
> Reply-To: c...@yahoogroups.com
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Hidden Intelligence Operation Behind the Wikileaks Release of "Secret" 
> Documents?
> 
> by F. William Engdahl
> 
>        
> 
>   
> 
>  
> Global Research, August 11, 2010
> 
>  Email this article to a friend
>  Print this article
> 
> 0diggsdigg                     
> 
> Since the dramatic release of a US military film of a US airborne shooting of 
> unarmed journalists in Iraq, Wiki-Leaks has gained global notoreity and 
> credibility as a daring website that releases sensitive material to the 
> public from whistleblowers within various governments. Their latest “coup” 
> involved alleged leak of thousands of pages of supposedly sensitive documents 
> regarding US informers within the Taliban in Afghanistan and their ties to 
> senior people linked to Pakistan’s ISI military intelligence. The evidence 
> suggests however that far from an honest leak, it is a calculated 
> disinformation to the gain of the US and perhaps Israeli and Indian 
> intelligence and a coverup of theUS and Western role in drug trafficking out 
> of Afghanistan.
>   
> Since the posting of the Afghan documents some days ago the Obama White House 
> has given the leaks credibility by claiming further leaks pose a threat to US 
> national security. Yet details of the papers reveals little that is 
> sensitive. The one figure most prominently mentioned, General (Retired) Hamid 
> Gul, former head of the Pakistani military intelligence agency, ISI, is the 
> man who during the 1980’s coordinated the CIA-financed Mujahideen guerilla 
> war inAfghanistan against the Soviet regime there. In the latest Wikileaks 
> documents, Gul is accused of regularly meeting Al Qaeda and Taliban leading 
> people and orchestrating suicide attacks on NATO forces in Afghanistan.
>   
> The leaked documents also claim that Osama bin Laden, who was reported dead 
> three years ago by the late Pakistan candidate Benazir Bhutto on BBC, was 
> still alive, conveniently keeping the myth alove for the Obama Administration 
> War on Terror at a point when most Americans had forgotten the original 
> reason the Bush Administration allegedly invaded Afghanistan to pursue the 
> Saudi Bin Laden for the 9/11 attacks.
>   
> Demonizing Pakistan?
>   
> The naming of Gul today as a key liaison to the Afghan “Taliban” forms part 
> of a larger pattern of US and British recent efforts to demonize the current 
> Pakistan regime as a key part of the problems in Afghanistan. Such a 
> demonization greatly boosts the position of recent US military ally, India. 
> Furthermore, Pakistan is the only muslim country possessing atomic weapons. 
> The Israeli Defense Forces and the Israeli Mossad intelligence agency 
> reportedly would very much like to change that. A phoney campaign against the 
> politically outspoken Gul via Wikileaks could be part of that geopolitical 
> effort.
>   
> The London Financial Times says Gul’s name appears in about 10 of roughly 180 
> classified US files that allegePakistan’s intelligence service supported 
> Afghan militants fighting Nato forces. Gul told the newspaper the US has lost 
> the war in Afghanistan, and that the leak of the documents would help the 
> Obama administration deflect blame by suggesting that Pakistan was 
> responsible. Gul told the paper, “I am a very favourite whipping boy of 
> America. They can’t imagine the Afghans can win wars on their own. It would 
> be an abiding shame that a 74-year-old general living a retired life 
> manipulating the Mujahedeen in Afghanistan results in the defeat of America.”
>   
> Notable, in light of the latest Afghan Wikileaks documents, is the spotlight 
> on the 74-year-old  Gul. As I wrote in a previous piece, Warum Afghanistan? 
> Teil VI:Washingtons Kriegsstrategie in Zentralasien, published this June on 
> this website, Gul has been outspoken about the role of the US military in 
> smuggling Afghan heroin out of the country via the top-security Manas Air 
> Base in Kyrgyzstan.
>  
> As well, in a UPI interview on September 26, 2001, two weeks after the 9-11 
> attacks, Gul stated, in reply to the question who did Black Sept. 11?, 
> “Mossad and its accomplices. The US spends $40 billion a year on its 11 
> intelligence agencies. That’s $400 billion in 10 years. Yet the Bush 
> Administration says it was taken by surprise. I don’t believe it. Within 10 
> minutes of the second twin tower being hit in the World Trade Center CNN said 
> Osama bin Laden had done it. That was a planned piece of disinformation by 
> the real perpetrators…” [1] Gul is clearly not well liked in Washington. He 
> claims his request for travel visas to the UK and to the USA have repeatedly 
> been denied. Making Gul into the arch enemy would suit some in Washington 
> nicely.
>  
> Who is Julian Assange?
>  
> Wikileaks founder and “Editor-in-chief”, Julian Assange, is a mysterious 
> 29-year-old Australian about whom little is known. He has suddenly become a 
> prominent public figure offering to mediate with the White House over the 
> leaks. Following the latest leaks, Assange told Der Spiegel, one of three 
> outlets with which he shared material from the most recent leak, that the 
> documents he had unearthed would “change our perspective on not only the war 
> in Afghanistan, but on all modern wars.” He stated in the same interview that 
> ‘”I enjoy crushing bastards.” Wikileaks, founded in 2006 by Assange, has no 
> fixed home and Assange claims he “lives in airports these days.”  
>  
> Yet a closer examination of the public position of Assange on one of the most 
> controversial issues of recent decades, the forces behind the September 11, 
> 2001 attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center shows him to be curiously 
> establishment. When the Belfast Telegraph interviewed him on July 19, he 
> stated,
> "Any time people with power plan in secret, they are conducting a conspiracy. 
> So there are conspiracies everywhere. There are also crazed conspiracy 
> theories. It's important not to confuse these two...." What about 9/11?: "I'm 
> constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 
> 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or 
> mass financial fraud." What about the Bilderberg Conference?: "That is 
> vaguely conspiratorial, in a networking sense. We have published their 
> meeting notes."[2]
> That statement from a person who has built a reputation of being 
> anti-establishment is more than notable. First, as thousands of physicists, 
> engineers, military professionals and airline pilots have testified, the idea 
> that 19 barely-trained Arabs armed with box-cutters could divert four US 
> commercial jets and execute the near-impossible strikes on the Twin Towers 
> and Pentagon over a time period of 93 minutes with not one Air Force NORAD 
> military interception, is beyond belief. Precisely who executed the 
> professional attack is a matter for genuine unbiased international inquiry.
>  
> Notable for Mr Assange’s blunt denial of any sinister 9/11 conspiracy is the 
> statement in a BBC interview by former US Senator, Bob Graham, who chaired 
> the United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence when it performed 
> its Joint Inquiry into 9/11. Graham told BBC, "I can just state that within 
> 9/11 there are too many secrets, that is information that has not been made 
> available to the public for which there are specific tangible credible 
> answers and that that withholding of those secrets has eroded public 
> confidence in their government as it relates to their own security." BBC 
> narrator: "Senator Graham found that the cover-up led to the heart of the 
> administration." Bob Graham: "I called the White House and talked with Ms. 
> Rice and said, ‘Look, we've been told we're gonna get cooperation in this 
> inquiry, and she said she'd look into it, and nothing happened.’”
>  
> Of course, the Bush Administration was able to use the 9/11 attacks to launch 
> its War on Terrorism in Afghanistanand then Iraq, a point Assange 
> conveniently omits.
>  
> For his part, General Gul claims that US intelligence orchestrated the 
> Wikileaks on Afghanistan to find a scapegoat, Gul, to blame. Conveniently, as 
> if on cue, British Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron, on a state 
> visit to India, lashed out at the alleged role of  Pakistan in supporting 
> Taliban in Afghanistan, conveniently lending further credibility to the 
> Wikileaks story. The real story of Wikileaks has clearly not yet been told.  
>  
> 
> Notes
>  
> [1] General Hamid Gul, Arnaud de Borchgrave 2001 Interview with Hamid Gul, 
> Former ISI Chief, UPI, reprinted July 2010 on 
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/07/28/arnaud-de-borchgrave-2001-interview-with-hamid-gul-former-isi-chief/
> [2] Julian Assange, Interview in Belfast Telegraph, July 19, 2010.
> 
> F. William Engdahl is a frequent contributor to Global Research.  Global 
> Research Articles by F. William Engdahl
> 
> Please support Global Research 
> Global Research relies on the financial support of its readers.
> 
> 
> Your endorsement is greatly appreciated
> 
> Subscribe to the Global Research E-Newsletter
> 
> Spread the word! Forward to a friend!
>  
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to